School System and Student Performance: Examining Science and Mathematics Achievement in Pakistan

Public and private school systems are the two largest providers of formal school education in Pakistan, differing significantly in their governance, resources, and practices. While previous studies showed differences in Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs), often favouring private schools, these comparisons remained largely descriptive. This paper compares elementary grade students’ performance in mathematics and science between public and private schools in Pakistan, accounting for factors such as grade level and geographical region. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 15,391 students from grades 5, 6, and 8, selected through a multistage sampling technique from a total of­­ 153 public and private schools across 06 regions of Pakistan. Valid and reliable Science Achievement Tests (SATs) and Mathematics Achievement Tests ( MATs) were directly administered to students. The results revealed that students in private schools demonstrated comparatively better understanding of both scientific and mathematical concepts than their counterparts in public schools. Of particular importance, regardless of the subject, the type of school system also predicted SLOs even after controlling for grade level and region. These findings contribute to the debate on comparative school performance in the context of developing countries, specifically in Pakistan. The study calls for targeted interventions to improve science and mathematics achievement in public schools and provides recommendations for policy, practice, and future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UMT Education Review
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.72.02
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

School System and Student Performance: Examining Science and Mathematics Achievement in Pakistan

Sadia Muzaffar Bhutta, Sohail Ahmad, Aisha Naz Ansari
UMT Education Review
School Choice and Performance
article

School System and Student Performance: Examining Science and Mathematics Achievement in Pakistan

Sadia Muzaffar Bhutta, Sohail Ahmad, Aisha Naz Ansari
article en

Abstract

Public and private school systems are the two largest providers of formal school education in Pakistan, differing significantly in their governance, resources, and practices. While previous studies showed differences in Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs), often favouring private schools, these comparisons remained largely descriptive. This paper compares elementary grade students’ performance in mathematics and science between public and private schools in Pakistan, accounting for factors such as grade level and geographical region. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 15,391 students from grades 5, 6, and 8, selected through a multistage sampling technique from a total of­­ 153 public and private schools across 06 regions of Pakistan. Valid and reliable Science Achievement Tests (SATs) and Mathematics Achievement Tests ( MATs) were directly administered to students. The results revealed that students in private schools demonstrated comparatively better understanding of both scientific and mathematical concepts than their counterparts in public schools. Of particular importance, regardless of the subject, the type of school system also predicted SLOs even after controlling for grade level and region. These findings contribute to the debate on comparative school performance in the context of developing countries, specifically in Pakistan. The study calls for targeted interventions to improve science and mathematics achievement in public schools and provides recommendations for policy, practice, and future research.

UMT Education ReviewVol. 7(2)
Aga Khan University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.