Neonatal Outcome Associated with Birth Order and Chorionicity in Twins Pregnancy

Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine the neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies based on the difference of chorionicity and order of delivery. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done among all women with >24 completed weeks gestation having twin pregnancies in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Dr. Soetomo General Hospital and Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia in 2023. Results: 49 twin from 1638 birth (2.99%) were recruited for the study. The MC groups had a higher prevalence of preterm birth <37 weeks (83.3 vs 53.8%), preterm birth <34 weeks (52.8 vs 15.4%), VLBW (25 vs 7.7%), ELBW (25 vs 15.4%), low Apgar scores at 5th minutes (50 vs 15.4%), admission to NICU (66.7 vs 15.4%), RDS (41.7 vs 7.7%), early neonatal death (33.3 vs 7.7%), and perinatal death (44.4 vs 15.4%) [p<0.05]. In relation to birth order, there were no significant difference in all neonatal outcomes, except the higher prevalence of lower Apgar scores in 1st (75 vs 50%) and 5th minutes (50 vs 19.4) in the second delivered MC twin (p=0.05). Out of the 98 twin babies, there were a total of 32 perinatal deaths (32.65%), consisting of eight stillbirths and twenty-four neonatal deaths. Conclusions: Chorionicity and birth order were influenced by the neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies. It is important to manage twin pregnancy in specialized or tertiary care center hospital.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32771/inajog.v13i2.2391
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neonatal Outcome Associated with Birth Order and Chorionicity in Twins Pregnancy

Khanisyah Erza Gumilar, Muhammad Ilham Aldika Akbar, Nur Aprilianita Pratama, Muhammad Adrianes Bachnaas
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

Neonatal Outcome Associated with Birth Order and Chorionicity in Twins Pregnancy

Khanisyah Erza Gumilar, Muhammad Ilham Aldika Akbar, Nur Aprilianita Pratama, Muhammad Adrianes Bachnaas
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine the neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies based on the difference of chorionicity and order of delivery. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done among all women with >24 completed weeks gestation having twin pregnancies in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Dr. Soetomo General Hospital and Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia in 2023. Results: 49 twin from 1638 birth (2.99%) were recruited for the study. The MC groups had a higher prevalence of preterm birth <37 weeks (83.3 vs 53.8%), preterm birth <34 weeks (52.8 vs 15.4%), VLBW (25 vs 7.7%), ELBW (25 vs 15.4%), low Apgar scores at 5th minutes (50 vs 15.4%), admission to NICU (66.7 vs 15.4%), RDS (41.7 vs 7.7%), early neonatal death (33.3 vs 7.7%), and perinatal death (44.4 vs 15.4%) [p<0.05]. In relation to birth order, there were no significant difference in all neonatal outcomes, except the higher prevalence of lower Apgar scores in 1st (75 vs 50%) and 5th minutes (50 vs 19.4) in the second delivered MC twin (p=0.05). Out of the 98 twin babies, there were a total of 32 perinatal deaths (32.65%), consisting of eight stillbirths and twenty-four neonatal deaths. Conclusions: Chorionicity and birth order were influenced by the neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies. It is important to manage twin pregnancy in specialized or tertiary care center hospital.

Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Sebelas Maret University (ID), Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Universitas Airlangga
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.