No Evidence of a Dichotomy in the Elliptical Galaxy Population

Abstract The advent of large integral field spectroscopic surveys has found that elliptical galaxies (EGs) can be divided into two classes: the fast rotators (whose kinematics are dominated by rotation) and the slow rotators (which exhibit slow or no rotation pattern). It is often suggested that while the slow rotators typically have boxy isophotal shapes, have a high α -to-iron abundance ratio, and are quite massive, the fast rotators often exhibit the opposite properties (that is, having disky isophotes, lower α -to-iron ratio, and of typical masses). Whether the EGs consist of two distinct populations (i.e., a dichotomy exists) remains an unsolved issue. To examine the existence of the dichotomy, we used a sample of 1895 EGs from the SDSS-IV MaNGA survey and measured robustly the stellar kinematics, isophotal shapes, and [Mg/Fe] ratio. We confirmed the previous finding that the bulk of the EGs are disky (65%) and fast rotators (67%), but we found no evidence supporting a dichotomy, based on a principal component analysis. The different classes (boxy/disky and slow/fast rotators) of EGs occupy slightly different loci in the principal component space. This may explain the observed trends that led to the premature support of a dichotomy based on small samples of galaxies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade0ba
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Evidence of a Dichotomy in the Elliptical Galaxy Population

Wei-Huai Chen, Yen‐Ting Lin, Po-Feng Wu, Abdurrouf et al.
1 links
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

No Evidence of a Dichotomy in the Elliptical Galaxy Population

Wei-Huai Chen, Yen‐Ting Lin, Po-Feng Wu, Abdurrouf, Rogério Monteiro-Oliveira, Chen-Yu Chuang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The advent of large integral field spectroscopic surveys has found that elliptical galaxies (EGs) can be divided into two classes: the fast rotators (whose kinematics are dominated by rotation) and the slow rotators (which exhibit slow or no rotation pattern). It is often suggested that while the slow rotators typically have boxy isophotal shapes, have a high α -to-iron abundance ratio, and are quite massive, the fast rotators often exhibit the opposite properties (that is, having disky isophotes, lower α -to-iron ratio, and of typical masses). Whether the EGs consist of two distinct populations (i.e., a dichotomy exists) remains an unsolved issue. To examine the existence of the dichotomy, we used a sample of 1895 EGs from the SDSS-IV MaNGA survey and measured robustly the stellar kinematics, isophotal shapes, and [Mg/Fe] ratio. We confirmed the previous finding that the bulk of the EGs are disky (65%) and fast rotators (67%), but we found no evidence supporting a dichotomy, based on a principal component analysis. The different classes (boxy/disky and slow/fast rotators) of EGs occupy slightly different loci in the principal component space. This may explain the observed trends that led to the premature support of a dichotomy based on small samples of galaxies.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 988(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No Evidence of a Dichotomy in the Elliptical Galaxy Population — Wei-Huai Chen, Yen‐Ting Lin, et al. · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS