Complaints versus compliance: Engineering noise and airflow solutions for air-cooled chillers in data centers

Air-cooled chillers (ACC) are essential to data center operations but present challenges in balancing acoustical performance, airflow efficiency, and structural constraints. This session examines the interplay between compliance and community complaints, focusing on downstream risks such as schedule delays, legal exposure, and cost overruns. It explores engineering approaches to mitigate noise, address airflow limitations—including static pressure effects and re-entrainment—and optimize thermal and energy performance. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, we evaluate airflow patterns, including dispersion and diffusion, to assess their impact on system performance and noise propagation. The session highlights structural considerations for equipment selection, site layouts, and retrofits, demonstrating how proactive design strategies can mitigate permitting delays and reduce complaints. Attendees will gain insight into integrating noise control measures with airflow and thermal performance requirements to de-risk projects while achieving compliance and reliability in demanding data center environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037239
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complaints versus compliance: Engineering noise and airflow solutions for air-cooled chillers in data centers

Matthew Downey, Viken Koukounian
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Complaints versus compliance: Engineering noise and airflow solutions for air-cooled chillers in data centers

Matthew Downey, Viken Koukounian
article en

Abstract

Air-cooled chillers (ACC) are essential to data center operations but present challenges in balancing acoustical performance, airflow efficiency, and structural constraints. This session examines the interplay between compliance and community complaints, focusing on downstream risks such as schedule delays, legal exposure, and cost overruns. It explores engineering approaches to mitigate noise, address airflow limitations—including static pressure effects and re-entrainment—and optimize thermal and energy performance. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, we evaluate airflow patterns, including dispersion and diffusion, to assess their impact on system performance and noise propagation. The session highlights structural considerations for equipment selection, site layouts, and retrofits, demonstrating how proactive design strategies can mitigate permitting delays and reduce complaints. Attendees will gain insight into integrating noise control measures with airflow and thermal performance requirements to de-risk projects while achieving compliance and reliability in demanding data center environments.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
Parks Canada (CA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complaints versus compliance: Engineering noise and airflow solutions for air-cooled chillers in data centers — Matthew Downey, Viken Koukounian · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS