Comparison of speech perception in virtual and real-life acoustic environments

Recent years have seen growing interest in using virtual acoustic scenes in laboratory environments to emulate real-life complex listening environments. Questions remain, however, regarding the degree to which virtual environments reflect typical complex listening environments in daily life. In this study, participants with and without hearing loss completed speech perception testing in eight virtual acoustic scenes. Then, participants were sent home for a week with a hearing aid research platform, the Portable Hearing Lab (PHL), and instructed to seek out situations that represented their typical complex listening environments. The PHL was used to record the environment, and ecological momentary assessment was used to characterize the environment, including the location, number of noise sources, orientationof speech and noise, and access to visual cues. Acoustic, non-acoustic, and speech perception differences between virtual and real-life complex environments were compared. Although most of the complex environments in daily life were encountered at home, the virtual scenes were fairly representative in terms of the sound levels, noise sources, noise locations, and signal-to-noise ratios. Speech perception scaled similarly between the virtual environments and real life as a function of sound level and acoustic complexity. The results generally support the ecological validity of virtual acoustic scenes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037312
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of speech perception in virtual and real-life acoustic environments

Volker Hohmann, Erik Jorgensen, Hendrik Kayser, Theresa Jansen
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Comparison of speech perception in virtual and real-life acoustic environments

Volker Hohmann, Erik Jorgensen, Hendrik Kayser, Theresa Jansen
article en

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing interest in using virtual acoustic scenes in laboratory environments to emulate real-life complex listening environments. Questions remain, however, regarding the degree to which virtual environments reflect typical complex listening environments in daily life. In this study, participants with and without hearing loss completed speech perception testing in eight virtual acoustic scenes. Then, participants were sent home for a week with a hearing aid research platform, the Portable Hearing Lab (PHL), and instructed to seek out situations that represented their typical complex listening environments. The PHL was used to record the environment, and ecological momentary assessment was used to characterize the environment, including the location, number of noise sources, orientationof speech and noise, and access to visual cues. Acoustic, non-acoustic, and speech perception differences between virtual and real-life complex environments were compared. Although most of the complex environments in daily life were encountered at home, the virtual scenes were fairly representative in terms of the sound levels, noise sources, noise locations, and signal-to-noise ratios. Speech perception scaled similarly between the virtual environments and real life as a function of sound level and acoustic complexity. The results generally support the ecological validity of virtual acoustic scenes.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
University of Iowa (US), Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Klinikum Oldenburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.