Investigating contextual effects in sound externalization

This study examines whether the perceived level of externalization of a virtual sound source (internalized versus externalized) can be influenced by the context, and in particular by the perceived level of externalization of a preceding source. Participants listened to pairs of sounds and had to judge whether the virtual source of the second sound (the target) was internalized or externalized. The first sound was either fully externalized (produced by a loudspeaker on the left of the participant) or internalized (reproduced diotically through headphones), while the target was reproduced through headphones as if coming from one of four loudspeakers in the room, at two distances (80 cm or 3 m) on the left or in front of the participant. Perceived externalization was, as expected, stronger for sounds originating from the side compared to those in front, and for distant sources compared to nearby ones, yet no significant influence of the preceding sound’s externalization level was found. Further Bayesian analyses are planned to confirm whether an absence of effect can be concluded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037305
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating contextual effects in sound externalization

Mathieu Lavandier, Fabien Perrin, Robin Duclermortier
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
article

Investigating contextual effects in sound externalization

Mathieu Lavandier, Fabien Perrin, Robin Duclermortier
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether the perceived level of externalization of a virtual sound source (internalized versus externalized) can be influenced by the context, and in particular by the perceived level of externalization of a preceding source. Participants listened to pairs of sounds and had to judge whether the virtual source of the second sound (the target) was internalized or externalized. The first sound was either fully externalized (produced by a loudspeaker on the left of the participant) or internalized (reproduced diotically through headphones), while the target was reproduced through headphones as if coming from one of four loudspeakers in the room, at two distances (80 cm or 3 m) on the left or in front of the participant. Perceived externalization was, as expected, stronger for sounds originating from the side compared to those in front, and for distant sources compared to nearby ones, yet no significant influence of the preceding sound’s externalization level was found. Further Bayesian analyses are planned to confirm whether an absence of effect can be concluded.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes (FR), Centre de Recherche en Linguistique Appliquée (FR), École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating contextual effects in sound externalization — Mathieu Lavandier, Fabien Perrin, et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS