Optimizing Oncology Generic Medication Selection in the Gulf Region: Expert Consensus and MCDA Tool Development

Background: Cancer remains a leading global health challenge, with high mortality rates and increasing financial burdens on healthcare systems. In the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, generic oncology medications offer a cost-effective alternative to patented treatments. However, disparities in regulatory frameworks and concerns about quality and supply reliability hinder their widespread adoption. Addressing these challenges is crucial to ensuring optimal access to oncology treatments. Methods: This study employed multicriteria decision analysis to evaluate key factors influencing the selection of off-patent oncology drugs. A structured survey was conducted among 10 formulary management experts from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. Participants engaged in a 3-hour workshop to assess and prioritize critical decision-making criteria through guided discussions, case studies, and weighting surveys. Results: The analysis identified manufacturing quality (30.8%), cost (20%), and use in reference countries (14.6%) as the most critical factors in selecting generic oncology mediations. Supply reliability (13%), regulatory aspects (8%), and pharmacovigilance services and extra services (6.8% each) also played supporting roles. The structured evaluation framework developed through this study provides insights into the factors shaping formulary decisions in the Gulf Cooperation Council region and highlights areas requiring regulatory and logistical improvements. Conclusion: This expert consensus underscores the need for a balanced approach that ensures quality, affordability, and accessibility in adopting oncology generics. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving pharmacovigilance, and enhancing stakeholder education are essential steps to optimizing the integration of oncology drugs into regional healthcare systems. These findings provide a foundation for policy recommendations aimed at improving generic drug adoption and patient outcomes in oncology care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of health economics and outcomes research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2025.140955
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Oncology Generic Medication Selection in the Gulf Region: Expert Consensus and MCDA Tool Development

Ahmed M. Nabeel, Anas Hamad, Ferdous Khan, Sana Alblooshi et al.
Journal of health economics and outcomes research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Optimizing Oncology Generic Medication Selection in the Gulf Region: Expert Consensus and MCDA Tool Development

Ahmed M. Nabeel, Anas Hamad, Ferdous Khan, Sana Alblooshi, Wael Sayam, Ahmad ElSheashaey, Omar AbdulAziz, Osama Abu Tabar, Sara Al Balushi, Mohamad Alfar, Eren Dawoud
article en

Abstract

Background: Cancer remains a leading global health challenge, with high mortality rates and increasing financial burdens on healthcare systems. In the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, generic oncology medications offer a cost-effective alternative to patented treatments. However, disparities in regulatory frameworks and concerns about quality and supply reliability hinder their widespread adoption. Addressing these challenges is crucial to ensuring optimal access to oncology treatments. Methods: This study employed multicriteria decision analysis to evaluate key factors influencing the selection of off-patent oncology drugs. A structured survey was conducted among 10 formulary management experts from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. Participants engaged in a 3-hour workshop to assess and prioritize critical decision-making criteria through guided discussions, case studies, and weighting surveys. Results: The analysis identified manufacturing quality (30.8%), cost (20%), and use in reference countries (14.6%) as the most critical factors in selecting generic oncology mediations. Supply reliability (13%), regulatory aspects (8%), and pharmacovigilance services and extra services (6.8% each) also played supporting roles. The structured evaluation framework developed through this study provides insights into the factors shaping formulary decisions in the Gulf Cooperation Council region and highlights areas requiring regulatory and logistical improvements. Conclusion: This expert consensus underscores the need for a balanced approach that ensures quality, affordability, and accessibility in adopting oncology generics. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving pharmacovigilance, and enhancing stakeholder education are essential steps to optimizing the integration of oncology drugs into regional healthcare systems. These findings provide a foundation for policy recommendations aimed at improving generic drug adoption and patient outcomes in oncology care.

Journal of health economics and outcomes research
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.