Comparative analysis of learning styles among students in preparatory programs for higher education entrance exams: general course versus medical-specific course

Considering that Generation Z has a learning profile distinct from previous generations, preparing students for university poses a pedagogical challenge. This cross-sectional study investigates the learning styles (LS) of students enrolled in preparatory courses for university entrance exams, known as vestibulares in Brazil, aiming to support the development of student-centered pedagogical strategies. A total of 280 students from the General Preparatory Course (GPC) and the Specific Preparatory Course for Medical School Entrance Exams (MPC) were assessed using the Felder and Silverman Learning Style Index (ILS). Gender, age, and exam preparation time were also analyzed. Data were subjected to bivariate analysis and logistic regression (SPSS; p < 0.05; 95% CI). The GPC group represented 72.9% of the sample; the average age was 18.9 ± 1.9 years; 56.4% were female; and 75.7% were in their first year of preparation. The most prevalent LS were visual (59.6%), sensorial (58.2%), sequential (45.0%), and active (36.8%). MPC students were more visual, sensorial, and sequential than GPC students, with a statistically significant difference in the sensorial style. No significant differences were found by gender, age, or preparation time. These results highlight the importance of tailoring university teaching strategies to the learning preferences of newer student generations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Caderno Pedagógico
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54033/cadpedv22n9-294
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of learning styles among students in preparatory programs for higher education entrance exams: general course versus medical-specific course

Marcel Fernando Inácio Cardozo, Rogério Leone Buchaim, Gilmar Cardozo de Jesus, Daniela Vieira Buchaim et al.
Caderno Pedagógico
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Comparative analysis of learning styles among students in preparatory programs for higher education entrance exams: general course versus medical-specific course

Marcel Fernando Inácio Cardozo, Rogério Leone Buchaim, Gilmar Cardozo de Jesus, Daniela Vieira Buchaim, João Paulo Mardegan Issa, Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha, Ewerton Alexandre Galdeano, Adriane Gonçalves Moura Cardozo
article en

Abstract

Considering that Generation Z has a learning profile distinct from previous generations, preparing students for university poses a pedagogical challenge. This cross-sectional study investigates the learning styles (LS) of students enrolled in preparatory courses for university entrance exams, known as vestibulares in Brazil, aiming to support the development of student-centered pedagogical strategies. A total of 280 students from the General Preparatory Course (GPC) and the Specific Preparatory Course for Medical School Entrance Exams (MPC) were assessed using the Felder and Silverman Learning Style Index (ILS). Gender, age, and exam preparation time were also analyzed. Data were subjected to bivariate analysis and logistic regression (SPSS; p < 0.05; 95% CI). The GPC group represented 72.9% of the sample; the average age was 18.9 ± 1.9 years; 56.4% were female; and 75.7% were in their first year of preparation. The most prevalent LS were visual (59.6%), sensorial (58.2%), sequential (45.0%), and active (36.8%). MPC students were more visual, sensorial, and sequential than GPC students, with a statistically significant difference in the sensorial style. No significant differences were found by gender, age, or preparation time. These results highlight the importance of tailoring university teaching strategies to the learning preferences of newer student generations.

Caderno PedagógicoVol. 22(9)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Fundação Faculdade de Odontologia (BR), Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí (BR), Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.