Paths and obstacles to an evidence-based, reproducible, and dynamic Plant Taxonomy

Plant taxonomy, though historically foundational in the biological sciences, has been slow to incorporate modern standards of scientific rigor. Traditional reliance on morphology and purely descriptive practices, with limited use of statistical and phylogenetic analysis, has resulted in low reproducibility and limited scientific robustness. This essay advocates for a shift toward an evidence-based and reproducible plant taxonomy, aligning plant systematics practices with contemporary principles of open science. For such an endeavor, it is highly recommended to adopt integrative and analytical approaches to taxa delimitation. In such an approach, taxa are not factual data, but rather conclusions drawn from analysis. Practical recommendations are offered to guide journals, researchers, and institutions toward a more robust and scientifically credible taxonomic practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/scielopreprints.12580
Primary Topic
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paths and obstacles to an evidence-based, reproducible, and dynamic Plant Taxonomy

Thiago André, Thaís Elias Almeida
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
article

Paths and obstacles to an evidence-based, reproducible, and dynamic Plant Taxonomy

Thiago André, Thaís Elias Almeida
article en

Abstract

Plant taxonomy, though historically foundational in the biological sciences, has been slow to incorporate modern standards of scientific rigor. Traditional reliance on morphology and purely descriptive practices, with limited use of statistical and phylogenetic analysis, has resulted in low reproducibility and limited scientific robustness. This essay advocates for a shift toward an evidence-based and reproducible plant taxonomy, aligning plant systematics practices with contemporary principles of open science. For such an endeavor, it is highly recommended to adopt integrative and analytical approaches to taxa delimitation. In such an approach, taxa are not factual data, but rather conclusions drawn from analysis. Practical recommendations are offered to guide journals, researchers, and institutions toward a more robust and scientifically credible taxonomic practice.

Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.