Policy Nook — Policy Note: Challenges and Approaches to Drought Management in Latin America

This policy note examines the current state of drought management in South America through a three-pillar framework: monitoring and early warning, vulnerability and impact assessment and mitigation and preparedness. Findings reveal substantial heterogeneity across countries, with only a few adopting proactive and integrated approaches. Most responses remain reactive, characterized by institutional fragmentation, weak early warning systems and limited availability of vulnerability and impact data. A composite index indicates that no country fully meets all its goals. The main challenges include the predominance of reactive and fragmented policy approaches, the weak integration of early warning systems and monitoring tools into decision-making processes, institutional gaps and inadequate intersectoral coordination, limited development and use of vulnerability and impact assessments, and constrained financial and technical capacities to support long-term resilience-building efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Economics and Policy
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x2571002x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Nook — Policy Note: Challenges and Approaches to Drought Management in Latin America

Julia Urquijo Reguera, Guillermo Donoso, Daniela Rivera, Jairo Paizano-Potoy
1 citations
Water Economics and Policy
Water resources management and optimization
1.15
article

Policy Nook — Policy Note: Challenges and Approaches to Drought Management in Latin America

Julia Urquijo Reguera, Guillermo Donoso, Daniela Rivera, Jairo Paizano-Potoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This policy note examines the current state of drought management in South America through a three-pillar framework: monitoring and early warning, vulnerability and impact assessment and mitigation and preparedness. Findings reveal substantial heterogeneity across countries, with only a few adopting proactive and integrated approaches. Most responses remain reactive, characterized by institutional fragmentation, weak early warning systems and limited availability of vulnerability and impact data. A composite index indicates that no country fully meets all its goals. The main challenges include the predominance of reactive and fragmented policy approaches, the weak integration of early warning systems and monitoring tools into decision-making processes, institutional gaps and inadequate intersectoral coordination, limited development and use of vulnerability and impact assessments, and constrained financial and technical capacities to support long-term resilience-building efforts.

Water Economics and Policy
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Institute for Environmental Management (US), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Water resources management and optimization
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.