Constraining scalars of 16 through proton decays in non-renormalisable SO(10) models

Non-renormalisable versions of SO(10) based on irreducible representations with lesser degrees of freedom, are free of running into the catastrophe of non-perturbativity of standard model gauge couplings in contrast to the renormalisable versions having tensors with many degrees of freedom. 16H is the smallest representation, participates in Yukawa Lagrangian at the non-renormalisable level, contributing to the charged and neutral fermion masses, and has six distinct scalars with different B−L charges. We computed the leptoquark and diquark couplings of different pairs of scalars stemming from all possible decomposition of the term resulting from the coupling of 16H with the 16 dimensional fermion multiplet of SO(10), i.e. 161616H16HΛ. Computing the tree and loop level contribution of different pairs to the effective dimension six, B−L conserving operators, it turns out only three pairs, viz σ(1,1,0)−T(3,1,13), and H(1,2,−12)−Δ(3,2,16), and H−T can induce proton decay at tree level. Assuming that the Yukawa couplings of the 16H are comparable to those of the 126‾H of a realistic SO(10) model and setting the cutoff scale to the Planck scale typically constrains the B−L breaking scale to be 4∼5 orders of magnitude less than the cutoff scale (Λ). Moreover, analysing the branching pattern of the leading two-body decay modes of the proton, we observed a preference for the proton to decay into second-generation mesons due to the hierarchical nature of Yukawa couplings. In a realistic SO(10) scenario, we find that MT>108 TeV, while MΔ could be as light as a few TeVs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Physics B
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117034
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraining scalars of 16 through proton decays in non-renormalisable SO(10) models

Saurabh K. Shukla
Nuclear Physics B
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Constraining scalars of 16 through proton decays in non-renormalisable SO(10) models

Saurabh K. Shukla
article en

Abstract

Non-renormalisable versions of SO(10) based on irreducible representations with lesser degrees of freedom, are free of running into the catastrophe of non-perturbativity of standard model gauge couplings in contrast to the renormalisable versions having tensors with many degrees of freedom. 16H is the smallest representation, participates in Yukawa Lagrangian at the non-renormalisable level, contributing to the charged and neutral fermion masses, and has six distinct scalars with different B−L charges. We computed the leptoquark and diquark couplings of different pairs of scalars stemming from all possible decomposition of the term resulting from the coupling of 16H with the 16 dimensional fermion multiplet of SO(10), i.e. 161616H16HΛ. Computing the tree and loop level contribution of different pairs to the effective dimension six, B−L conserving operators, it turns out only three pairs, viz σ(1,1,0)−T(3,1,13), and H(1,2,−12)−Δ(3,2,16), and H−T can induce proton decay at tree level. Assuming that the Yukawa couplings of the 16H are comparable to those of the 126‾H of a realistic SO(10) model and setting the cutoff scale to the Planck scale typically constrains the B−L breaking scale to be 4∼5 orders of magnitude less than the cutoff scale (Λ). Moreover, analysing the branching pattern of the leading two-body decay modes of the proton, we observed a preference for the proton to decay into second-generation mesons due to the hierarchical nature of Yukawa couplings. In a realistic SO(10) scenario, we find that MT>108 TeV, while MΔ could be as light as a few TeVs.

Nuclear Physics BVol. 1018
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.