Cross-cultural analysis of eye-movement patterns in visual scene perception: a comparison of seven cultural samples

This eye-tracking research investigates cross-cultural similarities and differences in visual attention in complex scenes free-viewing perception. The study utilizes 70 real-world photos with one or two focal objects as stimulus materials. The study examines the amount of time spent on focal objects, saccadic lengths, temporal changes in saccadic lengths and factors that influence these metrics. Data were collected between 2020 and 2022 from seven cultural samples in Africa, East Asia, Europe, and the Near East (N = 408). Contrary to initial hypotheses, the findings challenge the expected order of countries in terms of attention toward objects. Participants from Taiwan, assumed to exhibit holistic patterns, displayed the most holistic viewing pattern. Surprisingly, participants from Germany and Czechia did not significantly differ from those in Taiwan. Furthermore, participants from Ghana and Türkiye, expected to be moderate, showed the most analytic pattern. This challenges preconceived notions and contributes to understanding patterns of scene perception in underrepresented countries. Additional analyses explored the relationship between number and size of focal objects and dwell time, as well as the potential influence of sociodemographic variables, on dwell time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12724-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural analysis of eye-movement patterns in visual scene perception: a comparison of seven cultural samples

Čeněk Šašinka, Nicol Dostálová, Thomas Dresler, Jie-Li Tsai et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
article

Cross-cultural analysis of eye-movement patterns in visual scene perception: a comparison of seven cultural samples

Čeněk Šašinka, Nicol Dostálová, Thomas Dresler, Jie-Li Tsai, Jan Caha, Jiří Čeněk, David Lacko, Alžběta Šašinková, Daniela Halámková, Pavel Ugwitz, Zdeněk Stachoň, Albert Ahenkan, Jana Lüdtke, Petra Kalenská
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This eye-tracking research investigates cross-cultural similarities and differences in visual attention in complex scenes free-viewing perception. The study utilizes 70 real-world photos with one or two focal objects as stimulus materials. The study examines the amount of time spent on focal objects, saccadic lengths, temporal changes in saccadic lengths and factors that influence these metrics. Data were collected between 2020 and 2022 from seven cultural samples in Africa, East Asia, Europe, and the Near East (N = 408). Contrary to initial hypotheses, the findings challenge the expected order of countries in terms of attention toward objects. Participants from Taiwan, assumed to exhibit holistic patterns, displayed the most holistic viewing pattern. Surprisingly, participants from Germany and Czechia did not significantly differ from those in Taiwan. Furthermore, participants from Ghana and Türkiye, expected to be moderate, showed the most analytic pattern. This challenges preconceived notions and contributes to understanding patterns of scene perception in underrepresented countries. Additional analyses explored the relationship between number and size of focal objects and dwell time, as well as the potential influence of sociodemographic variables, on dwell time.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Ghana (GH), Masaryk University (CZ), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), German Center for Diabetes Research (DE), Mendel University in Brno (CZ), Brno University of Technology (CZ), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), National Chengchi University (TW)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.