DenseNet-Based Classification of EEG Abnormalities Using Spectrograms
Electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis is essential for diagnosing neurological disorders but typically requires expert interpretation and significant time. Purpose: This study aims to automate the classification of normal and abnormal EEG recordings to support clinical diagnosis and reduce manual workload. Automating the initial screening of EEGs can help clinicians quickly identify potential neurological abnormalities, enabling timely intervention and guiding further diagnostic and treatment strategies. Methodology: We utilized the Temple University Hospital EEG dataset to develop a DenseNet-based deep learning model. To enable a fair comparison of different EEG representations, we used three input types: signal images, spectrograms, and scalograms. To reduce dimensionality and simplify computation, we focused on two channels: T5 and O1. For interpretability, we applied Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to visualize the EEG regions influencing the model’s predictions. Key Findings: Among the input types, spectrogram-based representations achieved the highest classification accuracy, indicating that time-frequency features are especially effective for this task. The model demonstrated strong performance overall, and the integration of LIME and Grad-CAM provided transparent explanations of its decisions, enhancing interpretability. This approach offers a practical and interpretable solution for automated EEG screening, contributing to more efficient clinical workflows and better understanding of complex neurological conditions.
Authors
- Lan Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-3965)
- Catherine Mooney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7696-1364)
Institutions
- University College Dublin (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Algorithms
- Published
- 2025-08-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/a18080486
- Primary Topic
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00