Low-frequency structural vibration transmission—Finite element predictions compared to building measurements

Above-grade fitness centers can be an annoying source of vibration disturbance in buildings. Their potential impact is best evaluated at the design stage before people begin to use its treadmills, free weights, and exercise classes. Often the building does not yet exist and structural models provide the best way to evaluate potential impacts. The authors recently had the opportunity to compare finite element frequency response function (FRF) predictions to test data obtained in the field. The driving point accelerance predictions showed very good agreement with the test data up to 100 Hz. Cross-accelerance predictions from one point to another similarly showed good agreement with the test data. The test data also confirmed reciprocity when the drive and response points were interchanged. Test data in the field were obtained using both an instrumented force hammer and a drop weight with an accelerometer. Both methods produced consistent experimental FRFs. This study shows that a well-conceived finite element model can produce reasonable predictions of low-frequencystructural response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037979
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-frequency structural vibration transmission—Finite element predictions compared to building measurements

Jeffrey A. Zapfe, Ethan R. Brush
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Low-frequency structural vibration transmission—Finite element predictions compared to building measurements

Jeffrey A. Zapfe, Ethan R. Brush
article en

Abstract

Above-grade fitness centers can be an annoying source of vibration disturbance in buildings. Their potential impact is best evaluated at the design stage before people begin to use its treadmills, free weights, and exercise classes. Often the building does not yet exist and structural models provide the best way to evaluate potential impacts. The authors recently had the opportunity to compare finite element frequency response function (FRF) predictions to test data obtained in the field. The driving point accelerance predictions showed very good agreement with the test data up to 100 Hz. Cross-accelerance predictions from one point to another similarly showed good agreement with the test data. The test data also confirmed reciprocity when the drive and response points were interchanged. Test data in the field were obtained using both an instrumented force hammer and a drop weight with an accelerometer. Both methods produced consistent experimental FRFs. This study shows that a well-conceived finite element model can produce reasonable predictions of low-frequencystructural response.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
Acentech (United States) (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.