False hearing in L2-accented sentences

Unfamiliar accents complicate the task of speech perception, leading to reductions in intelligibility and increases in the effort listeners must put forth. One adaptive mechanism people may use to accommodate this challenge is to rely more on top-down processing during comprehension. To test this hypothesis, this study employed a false hearing paradigm (Sommers et al., 2015). Participants listened to sentences, half produced by an American English L1-accented speaker and half by an L2-accented speaker. Each sentence ended with a target word that was either highly predicted by the semantic context (e.g., “The captain steered the SHIP”) or was a phonological neighbor of the predicted word (e.g., “The captain steered the SHEEP”). We hypothesized that listeners would rely more on semantic context and less on bottom-up acoustic information for L2- versus L1-accented speech and thus show higher false hearing rates. Preliminary data show this to be the case: in incongruent sentences, young adults showed significantly higher false hearing rates in L2-accented sentences than in L1-accented sentences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038069
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

False hearing in L2-accented sentences

Kristin J. Van Engen, Zach Helfand
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

False hearing in L2-accented sentences

Kristin J. Van Engen, Zach Helfand
article en

Abstract

Unfamiliar accents complicate the task of speech perception, leading to reductions in intelligibility and increases in the effort listeners must put forth. One adaptive mechanism people may use to accommodate this challenge is to rely more on top-down processing during comprehension. To test this hypothesis, this study employed a false hearing paradigm (Sommers et al., 2015). Participants listened to sentences, half produced by an American English L1-accented speaker and half by an L2-accented speaker. Each sentence ended with a target word that was either highly predicted by the semantic context (e.g., “The captain steered the SHIP”) or was a phonological neighbor of the predicted word (e.g., “The captain steered the SHEEP”). We hypothesized that listeners would rely more on semantic context and less on bottom-up acoustic information for L2- versus L1-accented speech and thus show higher false hearing rates. Preliminary data show this to be the case: in incongruent sentences, young adults showed significantly higher false hearing rates in L2-accented sentences than in L1-accented sentences.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4_Supplement)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

False hearing in L2-accented sentences — Kristin J. Van Engen, Zach Helfand · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS