File Drawer Report: Infants’ Expectations for Mutual Affiliates

Past work found that infants expect affiliated social agents to preferentially support one another. For example, characters who imitate the actions of a specific social partner are more likely, compared to a non-imitator, to help that social partner in the future. Infants’ expectations appear to be based on inferences of specific relationships, as they do not generalize to new social targets. Here we ask, however, if infants will extend expectations of support to the friend of a friend. We investigated whether infants could use their observations of two social agents’ positive social imitation interactions with the same target to make a transitive inference that the mutual affiliates were likely to be affiliated themselves. We did not find any evidence that infants used these observations to infer that mutual affiliates were more likely to be affiliated themselves.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nmswd_v1
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

File Drawer Report: Infants’ Expectations for Mutual Affiliates

Lindsey J. Powell, Bill Pepe
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

File Drawer Report: Infants’ Expectations for Mutual Affiliates

Lindsey J. Powell, Bill Pepe
article en

Abstract

Past work found that infants expect affiliated social agents to preferentially support one another. For example, characters who imitate the actions of a specific social partner are more likely, compared to a non-imitator, to help that social partner in the future. Infants’ expectations appear to be based on inferences of specific relationships, as they do not generalize to new social targets. Here we ask, however, if infants will extend expectations of support to the friend of a friend. We investigated whether infants could use their observations of two social agents’ positive social imitation interactions with the same target to make a transitive inference that the mutual affiliates were likely to be affiliated themselves. We did not find any evidence that infants used these observations to infer that mutual affiliates were more likely to be affiliated themselves.

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

File Drawer Report: Infants’ Expectations for Mutual Affiliates — Lindsey J. Powell, Bill Pepe · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS