What do the Young People Think? Responses to the Censoring of Roald Dahl

Abstract In 2022 and 2023, children’s publisher Puffin released a set of Roald Dahl children’s titles significantly revised to take account of the sensibilities of contemporary readers. The announcement was met with widespread opposition, with high-profile writers including Salman Rushdie having their say on the matter. Following the overwhelmingly negative media-led response, which almost entirely characterised the revision as censorship, the publisher changed tack: it would retain the revised versions under the Puffin imprint, but also offer for sale the ‘classic’ versions under the Penguin imprint. In all the media coverage, young readers themselves were not consulted, or if they were, their responses have not been made public. There appears to be very little published empirical work with young readers themselves, on this specific issue or on censorship of children’s literature more generally. Since Dahl is one of the best-selling and simultaneously most-attacked writers of literature aimed at children, we wanted to investigate the views of young readers on the censorship of children’s literature, focussing on this recent re-writing of Roald Dahl books. To that end we conducted eight discussion workshops with 73 teenage students in three UK schools. We report on our findings and conclude that these young readers display a high level of insight and sophistication in their understanding and analysis of the censorship debate overall, and the censoring of Dahl in particular.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children s Literature in Education
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-025-09627-w
Primary Topic
Themes in Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What do the Young People Think? Responses to the Censoring of Roald Dahl

James E. Pope, Charlotte Fodor
Children s Literature in Education
Themes in Literature Analysis
article

What do the Young People Think? Responses to the Censoring of Roald Dahl

James E. Pope, Charlotte Fodor
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2022 and 2023, children’s publisher Puffin released a set of Roald Dahl children’s titles significantly revised to take account of the sensibilities of contemporary readers. The announcement was met with widespread opposition, with high-profile writers including Salman Rushdie having their say on the matter. Following the overwhelmingly negative media-led response, which almost entirely characterised the revision as censorship, the publisher changed tack: it would retain the revised versions under the Puffin imprint, but also offer for sale the ‘classic’ versions under the Penguin imprint. In all the media coverage, young readers themselves were not consulted, or if they were, their responses have not been made public. There appears to be very little published empirical work with young readers themselves, on this specific issue or on censorship of children’s literature more generally. Since Dahl is one of the best-selling and simultaneously most-attacked writers of literature aimed at children, we wanted to investigate the views of young readers on the censorship of children’s literature, focussing on this recent re-writing of Roald Dahl books. To that end we conducted eight discussion workshops with 73 teenage students in three UK schools. We report on our findings and conclude that these young readers display a high level of insight and sophistication in their understanding and analysis of the censorship debate overall, and the censoring of Dahl in particular.

Children s Literature in Education
Bournemouth University (GB)
Bournemouth University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Themes in Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.