Do eye movements reflect readers’ thoughts during reading? Evidence from multidimensional experience sampling and eye movements

While reading narrative texts, readers' attention often fluctuates from the text (e.g., immersion) to text-unrelated thoughts (e.g., mind-wandering). Research on mind-wandering and immersion suggests that they influence the reading process differently. In this article, we examine the types of thoughts readers have while reading a literary text. Specifically, we investigated the effect of immersion and mind-wandering on eye-movement behaviour during reading. Fifty-six participants read extracts from a novel while their eye-movements were monitored. Participants' thoughts were probed using multidimensional experience sampling. We identified four types of thought: Immersion, Mind-wandering, Sub-Vocalization, and Social Episodic Thoughts. We then ran General Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs) to examine the relationship between these thought types and eye movements. Results show that eye movements are influenced by the types of thoughts readers experience while reading literary texts. These results have important implications for the way that mind-wandering is typically investigated, particularly in reading research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2025.103918
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do eye movements reflect readers’ thoughts during reading? Evidence from multidimensional experience sampling and eye movements

Karin Kukkonen, Diane Caroline Mézière, Jaana Simola, Johanna K. Kaakinen et al.
3 citations
Consciousness and Cognition
Mind wandering and attention
4.29
article

Do eye movements reflect readers’ thoughts during reading? Evidence from multidimensional experience sampling and eye movements

Karin Kukkonen, Diane Caroline Mézière, Jaana Simola, Johanna K. Kaakinen, Esa Ranta, Jonathan Smallwood
article en
3 citations

Abstract

While reading narrative texts, readers' attention often fluctuates from the text (e.g., immersion) to text-unrelated thoughts (e.g., mind-wandering). Research on mind-wandering and immersion suggests that they influence the reading process differently. In this article, we examine the types of thoughts readers have while reading a literary text. Specifically, we investigated the effect of immersion and mind-wandering on eye-movement behaviour during reading. Fifty-six participants read extracts from a novel while their eye-movements were monitored. Participants' thoughts were probed using multidimensional experience sampling. We identified four types of thought: Immersion, Mind-wandering, Sub-Vocalization, and Social Episodic Thoughts. We then ran General Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs) to examine the relationship between these thought types and eye movements. Results show that eye movements are influenced by the types of thoughts readers experience while reading literary texts. These results have important implications for the way that mind-wandering is typically investigated, particularly in reading research.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 134
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI), Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oslo (NO), Queen's University (CA)
Academy of Finland
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mind wandering and attention
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do eye movements reflect readers’ thoughts during reading? Evidence from multidimensional experience sampling and eye movements — Karin Kukkonen, Diane Caroline Mézière, et al. · Consciousness and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS