Scalar flux transport models for self-similar turbulent mixing

A common approach to closing turbulent species flux in multicomponent Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes models is to use the standard gradient diffusion approximation. While such an approach has been shown to work well when applied to many canonical turbulent mixing configurations, a gradient diffusion approach is fundamentally limited in its ability to capture complex phenomena such as countergradient transport. For this reason, complicated mixing applications may benefit by treating the turbulent diffusivity with a model transport equation in a manner analogous to second-moment momentum closure in Reynolds-stress transport models. The present work explores the development and application of two different scalar flux transport (SFT) models. Self-similarity constraints are derived for these models, and they are evaluated against gradient-diffusion-based models in several one- and two-dimensional problems of turbulent mixing. It is found that the new SFT models out-perform gradient diffusion models in problems involving rapid acceleration reversal and in problems involving anisotropic transport of materials. In addition, it is found that even a hybrid-SFT approach, in which an SFT equation is utilized along with a gradient diffusion closure, provides some measure of improvement over models that transport the mass flux rather than the scalar flux.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/vcs5-7ymc
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scalar flux transport models for self-similar turbulent mixing

Karl J. Friston
Physical review. E
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Scalar flux transport models for self-similar turbulent mixing

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

A common approach to closing turbulent species flux in multicomponent Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes models is to use the standard gradient diffusion approximation. While such an approach has been shown to work well when applied to many canonical turbulent mixing configurations, a gradient diffusion approach is fundamentally limited in its ability to capture complex phenomena such as countergradient transport. For this reason, complicated mixing applications may benefit by treating the turbulent diffusivity with a model transport equation in a manner analogous to second-moment momentum closure in Reynolds-stress transport models. The present work explores the development and application of two different scalar flux transport (SFT) models. Self-similarity constraints are derived for these models, and they are evaluated against gradient-diffusion-based models in several one- and two-dimensional problems of turbulent mixing. It is found that the new SFT models out-perform gradient diffusion models in problems involving rapid acceleration reversal and in problems involving anisotropic transport of materials. In addition, it is found that even a hybrid-SFT approach, in which an SFT equation is utilized along with a gradient diffusion closure, provides some measure of improvement over models that transport the mass flux rather than the scalar flux.

Physical review. EVol. 112(2)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scalar flux transport models for self-similar turbulent mixing — Karl J. Friston · Physical review. E (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS