El gatopardismo en las relaciones internacionales

The article offers a critical and hermeneutic reading of International Law, drawing on the metaphor of Il Gattopardo to highlight how formal changes often serve to preserve underlying structures of power. It underscores the structural crisis of the international legal system, marked by tensions between norm and force, legitimacy and hegemony. While acknowledging achievements such as the universalization of human rights and the post-1945 consolidation of multilateral institutions, the article cautions against their instrumentalization by hegemonic powers through legal rhetoric that conceals underlying dynamics of domination. The emergence of actors such as the BRICS is interpreted not as a substantive transformation of the international order, but rather as a redistribution of power within its existing structures. Given this scenario, the article advocates for a "struggle for law" that goes beyond mere formal reform, envisioning a more just, participatory, and pluralistic international legal order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Electrónica de Derecho Internacional Contemporáneo
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24215/2618303xe079
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

El gatopardismo en las relaciones internacionales

Carlos Gil Gandía
Revista Electrónica de Derecho Internacional Contemporáneo
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

El gatopardismo en las relaciones internacionales

Carlos Gil Gandía
article en

Abstract

The article offers a critical and hermeneutic reading of International Law, drawing on the metaphor of Il Gattopardo to highlight how formal changes often serve to preserve underlying structures of power. It underscores the structural crisis of the international legal system, marked by tensions between norm and force, legitimacy and hegemony. While acknowledging achievements such as the universalization of human rights and the post-1945 consolidation of multilateral institutions, the article cautions against their instrumentalization by hegemonic powers through legal rhetoric that conceals underlying dynamics of domination. The emergence of actors such as the BRICS is interpreted not as a substantive transformation of the international order, but rather as a redistribution of power within its existing structures. Given this scenario, the article advocates for a "struggle for law" that goes beyond mere formal reform, envisioning a more just, participatory, and pluralistic international legal order.

Revista Electrónica de Derecho Internacional ContemporáneoVol. 8(8)
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.