Artificial Intelligence, Platform Capitalist Power, and the Impact of the Crisis of Truth on Ethnography

This article reviews recent debates on the contemporary crisis of truth and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled platforms and constructions, including social media, deepfakes, and new algorithmic governance settings. The latter are often seen as essential in producing the former, though the wider implications of both on ethnography have been scarcely explored. Anthropologists have criticized technosolutionist AI assumptions of control but also creatively combined AI and ethnographic forms of knowledge production. Neither, however, has led to a renewed appreciation of truth, among other reasons due to the dominance of new materialist, ontological, and related theoretical strands. In contrast, the article makes the case for a planetary ethnography centered around the relations among ethnography, (post-)truth, and AI-enabled platform capitalist power. This argument may help not only to productively understand the contemporary crisis of truth, but also to renew an anthropological politics around speaking truth to power in the context of escalating planetary crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-071323-113942
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence, Platform Capitalist Power, and the Impact of the Crisis of Truth on Ethnography

Bram Büscher
2 citations
Annual Review of Anthropology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Artificial Intelligence, Platform Capitalist Power, and the Impact of the Crisis of Truth on Ethnography

Bram Büscher
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article reviews recent debates on the contemporary crisis of truth and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled platforms and constructions, including social media, deepfakes, and new algorithmic governance settings. The latter are often seen as essential in producing the former, though the wider implications of both on ethnography have been scarcely explored. Anthropologists have criticized technosolutionist AI assumptions of control but also creatively combined AI and ethnographic forms of knowledge production. Neither, however, has led to a renewed appreciation of truth, among other reasons due to the dominance of new materialist, ontological, and related theoretical strands. In contrast, the article makes the case for a planetary ethnography centered around the relations among ethnography, (post-)truth, and AI-enabled platform capitalist power. This argument may help not only to productively understand the contemporary crisis of truth, but also to renew an anthropological politics around speaking truth to power in the context of escalating planetary crises.

Annual Review of AnthropologyVol. 54(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.