Perbandingan IndoBERT dan IndoRoBERTa Untuk Analisis Sentimen Pada Film Dokumenter Dirty Vote

Sentiment analysis is a technique in Natural Language Processing (NLP) used to identify and categorize opinions or emotions in text. This study compares the performance of two Transformer-based models, IndoBERT and IndoRoBERTa, in analyzing sentiment toward the documentary film Dirty Vote. The research process includes data collection, text preprocessing, lexicon-based sentiment labeling, and model evaluation using K-Fold Cross-Validation. The results show that IndoBERT achieved an average accuracy of 99%, higher than IndoRoBERTa, which achieved 94%. IndoBERT also demonstrated better alignment with lexicon-based labeling in classifying positive, negative, and neutral sentiments. In terms of architecture, IndoBERT employs static masking, while IndoRoBERTa applies dynamic masking, leading to differences in the models' sensitivity to textual meaning. IndoBERT tends to provide more definitive classifications for opinions or strong criticisms, whereas IndoRoBERTa more frequently categorizes ambiguous comments as neutral sentiment. The conclusion of this study indicates that IndoBERT outperforms IndoRoBERTa in sentiment analysis of the documentary film Dirty Vote, both in terms of accuracy and consistency with lexicon-based labeling. These findings provide insights into the effectiveness of Transformer-based models for sentiment analysis in the Indonesian language and can serve as a reference for further NLP model development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Informatika Jurnal Pengembangan IT
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30591/jpit.v10i3.8607
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multimedia Learning Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perbandingan IndoBERT dan IndoRoBERTa Untuk Analisis Sentimen Pada Film Dokumenter Dirty Vote

Teguh Ikhlas Ramadhan, Cepi Rahmat Hidayat, Fadhel Muhammad Apriansyah, Anggito Karta Wijaya
1 citations
Jurnal Informatika Jurnal Pengembangan IT
Multimedia Learning Systems
3.25
article

Perbandingan IndoBERT dan IndoRoBERTa Untuk Analisis Sentimen Pada Film Dokumenter Dirty Vote

Teguh Ikhlas Ramadhan, Cepi Rahmat Hidayat, Fadhel Muhammad Apriansyah, Anggito Karta Wijaya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is a technique in Natural Language Processing (NLP) used to identify and categorize opinions or emotions in text. This study compares the performance of two Transformer-based models, IndoBERT and IndoRoBERTa, in analyzing sentiment toward the documentary film Dirty Vote. The research process includes data collection, text preprocessing, lexicon-based sentiment labeling, and model evaluation using K-Fold Cross-Validation. The results show that IndoBERT achieved an average accuracy of 99%, higher than IndoRoBERTa, which achieved 94%. IndoBERT also demonstrated better alignment with lexicon-based labeling in classifying positive, negative, and neutral sentiments. In terms of architecture, IndoBERT employs static masking, while IndoRoBERTa applies dynamic masking, leading to differences in the models' sensitivity to textual meaning. IndoBERT tends to provide more definitive classifications for opinions or strong criticisms, whereas IndoRoBERTa more frequently categorizes ambiguous comments as neutral sentiment. The conclusion of this study indicates that IndoBERT outperforms IndoRoBERTa in sentiment analysis of the documentary film Dirty Vote, both in terms of accuracy and consistency with lexicon-based labeling. These findings provide insights into the effectiveness of Transformer-based models for sentiment analysis in the Indonesian language and can serve as a reference for further NLP model development.

Jurnal Informatika Jurnal Pengembangan ITVol. 10(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Multimedia Learning Systems
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.