Modeling human-autonomy team steering behavior in shared-autonomy driving scenarios

Well-accepted models such as the two-point steering model and its variations describe human steering behavior in non-autonomous vehicles. However, these models may not describe human steering in a shared autonomous vehicle, where the human driver cooperates with an autonomous controller. This work explores how the generalized two-point steering model, a variation of the classical two-point model, may apply to human steering in a shared autonomous vehicle. This study reports two key findings: (1) We find that humans do not necessarily steer the vehicle to the exact lane center, perhaps due to imprecise distance perception or a preference to stay off-center in the lane. Thus, we propose adding a steering bias term to the generalized steering model to account for this behavior; (2) We also find that human steering adapts so that the overall team steering–the combined human and autonomous steering input–behaves according to the generalized steering model with this new bias term. We collected data over 150 runs across 5 drivers and 3 levels of autonomy, and found that the modified generalized steering model accurately predicts team steering behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.003
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling human-autonomy team steering behavior in shared-autonomy driving scenarios

A. Agung Julius, E. Rene, Sandipan Mishra, Kara Daveron
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Modeling human-autonomy team steering behavior in shared-autonomy driving scenarios

A. Agung Julius, E. Rene, Sandipan Mishra, Kara Daveron
article en

Abstract

Well-accepted models such as the two-point steering model and its variations describe human steering behavior in non-autonomous vehicles. However, these models may not describe human steering in a shared autonomous vehicle, where the human driver cooperates with an autonomous controller. This work explores how the generalized two-point steering model, a variation of the classical two-point model, may apply to human steering in a shared autonomous vehicle. This study reports two key findings: (1) We find that humans do not necessarily steer the vehicle to the exact lane center, perhaps due to imprecise distance perception or a preference to stay off-center in the lane. Thus, we propose adding a steering bias term to the generalized steering model to account for this behavior; (2) We also find that human steering adapts so that the overall team steering–the combined human and autonomous steering input–behaves according to the generalized steering model with this new bias term. We collected data over 150 runs across 5 drivers and 3 levels of autonomy, and found that the modified generalized steering model accurately predicts team steering behavior.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(3)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US), Prairie View A&M University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.