A comparative study of defense strategies for managing malicious participants and its effects in Federated Learning systems

Federated Learning (FL) is a dispersed machine learning technique that allows participants to cooperatively train a model without the need to disclose their private data. However, the distributed nature of FL introduces new threats as it increases the likelihood of compromised participants. Federated Learning is vulnerable to poisoning attacks, in which deceptive clients deliberately send harmful model updates to the server, thereby compromising the integrity of the global model. In this paper, we perform a comparative analysis of 30 different security strategies or defense mechanisms aimed at mitigating the negative impact of malicious nodes. This analysis is the first to shed light on several research gaps in addressing malicious or compromised clients within a federated learning system. We conclude the paper by outlining a set of research directions aimed at developing FL-based defense systems that can address the identified gaps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccc64910.2025.11077213
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of defense strategies for managing malicious participants and its effects in Federated Learning systems

Tina Elizabeth Mathew, James Joseph
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

A comparative study of defense strategies for managing malicious participants and its effects in Federated Learning systems

Tina Elizabeth Mathew, James Joseph
article en

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is a dispersed machine learning technique that allows participants to cooperatively train a model without the need to disclose their private data. However, the distributed nature of FL introduces new threats as it increases the likelihood of compromised participants. Federated Learning is vulnerable to poisoning attacks, in which deceptive clients deliberately send harmful model updates to the server, thereby compromising the integrity of the global model. In this paper, we perform a comparative analysis of 30 different security strategies or defense mechanisms aimed at mitigating the negative impact of malicious nodes. This analysis is the first to shed light on several research gaps in addressing malicious or compromised clients within a federated learning system. We conclude the paper by outlining a set of research directions aimed at developing FL-based defense systems that can address the identified gaps.

University of Kerala (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study of defense strategies for managing malicious participants and its effects in Federated Learning systems — Tina Elizabeth Mathew, James Joseph · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS