Examining the ‘blessing’ effects of natural resource endowments on economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean

Abstract The implications of the natural resources “curse” hypothesis are enormous for the design of economic policies, and an erroneous appreciation of this phenomenon can lead to poor decision-making with disastrous impacts on the regional economy. This study presents new evidence regarding this hypothesis for the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region measuring the impact on the region’s economic growth. The long- and short-run elasticities are estimated, and both the abundance and dependence effects are measured through different variables. The evidence indicates that this hypothesis is not validated for the region and that the main drivers of growth continue to be traditional factors, such as the accumulation of human and physical capital. To a lesser extent, both renewable and non-renewable natural resources also positively impact economic growth. Our study confirms a ‘blessing’ effect from these resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirica
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-025-09657-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the ‘blessing’ effects of natural resource endowments on economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean

Néstor Le Clech
1 citations
Empirica
Natural Resources and Economic Development
3.09
article

Examining the ‘blessing’ effects of natural resource endowments on economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean

Néstor Le Clech
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The implications of the natural resources “curse” hypothesis are enormous for the design of economic policies, and an erroneous appreciation of this phenomenon can lead to poor decision-making with disastrous impacts on the regional economy. This study presents new evidence regarding this hypothesis for the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region measuring the impact on the region’s economic growth. The long- and short-run elasticities are estimated, and both the abundance and dependence effects are measured through different variables. The evidence indicates that this hypothesis is not validated for the region and that the main drivers of growth continue to be traditional factors, such as the accumulation of human and physical capital. To a lesser extent, both renewable and non-renewable natural resources also positively impact economic growth. Our study confirms a ‘blessing’ effect from these resources.

EmpiricaVol. 52(4)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Universidad de Sevilla
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.