GLOBAL HOME THEORY: ETHICS, EQUITY, AND DIGNITY IN MORTGAGE LENDING

In an era of increasing economic uncertainty, job volatility, and social displacement, the concept of homeownership continues to hold deep personal, emotional, and cultural value for individuals and families. However, the prevailing mortgage systems are often built on rigid financial protocols that prioritize institutional security over borrower dignity. These systems tend to react punitively to short-term payment defaults, frequently overlooking critical factors such as the borrowers long-term repayment history, equity accumulation in the property, and the genuine intent to reside rather than profit from the asset. This paper introduces a new ethical framework referred to as the Global Home Theory, which advocates for a more humane, equitable, and socially responsive approach to housing finance. The framework proposes that borrowers who have built substantial equity in their homes, typically through years of consistent mortgage payments, should receive structured protection against foreclosure when facing temporary financial hardships. It distinguishes between delinquency caused by economic instability and willful default, urging lenders to incorporate equity-based risk assessment and moral intent analysis into their recovery protocols. Furthermore, the theory challenges the classification of homes as non-performing assets (NPAs) based solely on missed EMIs, especially when the property holds long-term appreciation potential and the borrowers residency is evident. It calls for the development of mechanisms such as judicial review before foreclosure, temporary EMI relief windows, and income-recovery support systems that enable the borrower to resume payments without losing their home. The ultimate aim is to shift mortgage lending from a purely transactional model to one that recognizes the home as a human necessity rather than a commoditized asset. By fostering trust, social justice, and shared accountability between borrowers and lenders, the Global Home Theory offers a path toward more resilient housing ecosystems and inclusive financial governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/21229
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GLOBAL HOME THEORY: ETHICS, EQUITY, AND DIGNITY IN MORTGAGE LENDING

P. Saravana Kumar
International Journal of Advanced Research
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

GLOBAL HOME THEORY: ETHICS, EQUITY, AND DIGNITY IN MORTGAGE LENDING

P. Saravana Kumar
article en

Abstract

In an era of increasing economic uncertainty, job volatility, and social displacement, the concept of homeownership continues to hold deep personal, emotional, and cultural value for individuals and families. However, the prevailing mortgage systems are often built on rigid financial protocols that prioritize institutional security over borrower dignity. These systems tend to react punitively to short-term payment defaults, frequently overlooking critical factors such as the borrowers long-term repayment history, equity accumulation in the property, and the genuine intent to reside rather than profit from the asset. This paper introduces a new ethical framework referred to as the Global Home Theory, which advocates for a more humane, equitable, and socially responsive approach to housing finance. The framework proposes that borrowers who have built substantial equity in their homes, typically through years of consistent mortgage payments, should receive structured protection against foreclosure when facing temporary financial hardships. It distinguishes between delinquency caused by economic instability and willful default, urging lenders to incorporate equity-based risk assessment and moral intent analysis into their recovery protocols. Furthermore, the theory challenges the classification of homes as non-performing assets (NPAs) based solely on missed EMIs, especially when the property holds long-term appreciation potential and the borrowers residency is evident. It calls for the development of mechanisms such as judicial review before foreclosure, temporary EMI relief windows, and income-recovery support systems that enable the borrower to resume payments without losing their home. The ultimate aim is to shift mortgage lending from a purely transactional model to one that recognizes the home as a human necessity rather than a commoditized asset. By fostering trust, social justice, and shared accountability between borrowers and lenders, the Global Home Theory offers a path toward more resilient housing ecosystems and inclusive financial governance.

International Journal of Advanced ResearchVol. 13(06)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GLOBAL HOME THEORY: ETHICS, EQUITY, AND DIGNITY IN MORTGAGE LENDING — P. Saravana Kumar · International Journal of Advanced Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS