Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Metal Mesh and Glass Fiber Reinforced Maxillary Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the fracture resistance of maxillary denture bases reinforced with metal mesh and glass fiber mesh at various locations. Materials and methods: Twenty-four maxillary denture bases were divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 8 each) based on reinforcement method: cobalt-chromium (Co–Cr) metal mesh (Maarc, Germany), glass fiber mesh (Megazone, India), and control. Each group was further divided based on reinforcement location as full coverage, anterior half, posterior half, and midline region. The fracture resistance of control group and reinforced group denture bases was evaluated using universal testing machine. Intergroup comparison was done using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, followed by <i>post hoc</i> analysis. Results: The findings revealed that metal mesh has significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.001) improved fracture resistance (4112 kgf) as compared to glass fiber mesh (2312 kgf), irrespective of location. Among the coverage areas, full coverage with metal mesh (4112.06 kgf) displayed the highest resistance to fracture, followed by the anterior (3710.89 kgf), midline (3687.50 kgf) and posterior (3458.65 kgf) regions. However, incorporation of glass fiber mesh enhanced fracture resistance as compared to the control group. The posterior half coverage region exhibited the weakest resistance across both materials, highlighting its vulnerability to fracture. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that metal mesh provides superior reinforcement over glass fiber mesh in enhancing fracture resistance, with full coverage offering the greatest strength. Metal mesh can be used in clinical situations with high-stress areas, which can improve denture longevity and reduce fracture-related failures. How to cite this article: Goyal MK, Sharma S, Paul G, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Metal Mesh and Glass Fiber Reinforced Maxillary Denture Bases: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2025;15(2):112–117.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1503
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Metal Mesh and Glass Fiber Reinforced Maxillary Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study

Goutam Paul, Isha Saxena, Shweta Sharma, Mukesh Goyal et al.
4 links
International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Metal Mesh and Glass Fiber Reinforced Maxillary Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study

Goutam Paul, Isha Saxena, Shweta Sharma, Mukesh Goyal, Shalini Chauhan, FNU Madhav
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the fracture resistance of maxillary denture bases reinforced with metal mesh and glass fiber mesh at various locations. Materials and methods: Twenty-four maxillary denture bases were divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 8 each) based on reinforcement method: cobalt-chromium (Co–Cr) metal mesh (Maarc, Germany), glass fiber mesh (Megazone, India), and control. Each group was further divided based on reinforcement location as full coverage, anterior half, posterior half, and midline region. The fracture resistance of control group and reinforced group denture bases was evaluated using universal testing machine. Intergroup comparison was done using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, followed by <i>post hoc</i> analysis. Results: The findings revealed that metal mesh has significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.001) improved fracture resistance (4112 kgf) as compared to glass fiber mesh (2312 kgf), irrespective of location. Among the coverage areas, full coverage with metal mesh (4112.06 kgf) displayed the highest resistance to fracture, followed by the anterior (3710.89 kgf), midline (3687.50 kgf) and posterior (3458.65 kgf) regions. However, incorporation of glass fiber mesh enhanced fracture resistance as compared to the control group. The posterior half coverage region exhibited the weakest resistance across both materials, highlighting its vulnerability to fracture. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that metal mesh provides superior reinforcement over glass fiber mesh in enhancing fracture resistance, with full coverage offering the greatest strength. Metal mesh can be used in clinical situations with high-stress areas, which can improve denture longevity and reduce fracture-related failures. How to cite this article: Goyal MK, Sharma S, Paul G, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Metal Mesh and Glass Fiber Reinforced Maxillary Denture Bases: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2025;15(2):112–117.

International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.