Higher Education Accreditation System in Afghanistan: A Comparative Analysis of Bhutan and Sri Lanka

This article aims to compare Afghanistan’s accreditation system with those of Bhutan and Sri Lanka to identify areas for improvement in the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) accreditation system checklist. A Qualitative research approach is applied to analyse the secondary data. The findings reveal that the MoHE’s checklist has numerous flaws, particularly the way checklists are designed, too much weightage to research activities, requiring institutions to unnecessarily publish plans on walls, corridors, and social media platforms, the unlimited authority of the visiting board, the paradox in the indicators of digitalisation and internationalisation and the way evaluation is conducted are some of the major issues discussed in details in this article. The paper recommends that these major issues need to be addressed in future accreditation processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31841/kjssh-8.1-2025-85
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Higher Education Accreditation System in Afghanistan: A Comparative Analysis of Bhutan and Sri Lanka

Sarbajeet Mukherjee, Matiullah Aryanpor
Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Higher Education Accreditation System in Afghanistan: A Comparative Analysis of Bhutan and Sri Lanka

Sarbajeet Mukherjee, Matiullah Aryanpor
article en

Abstract

This article aims to compare Afghanistan’s accreditation system with those of Bhutan and Sri Lanka to identify areas for improvement in the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) accreditation system checklist. A Qualitative research approach is applied to analyse the secondary data. The findings reveal that the MoHE’s checklist has numerous flaws, particularly the way checklists are designed, too much weightage to research activities, requiring institutions to unnecessarily publish plans on walls, corridors, and social media platforms, the unlimited authority of the visiting board, the paradox in the indicators of digitalisation and internationalisation and the way evaluation is conducted are some of the major issues discussed in details in this article. The paper recommends that these major issues need to be addressed in future accreditation processes.

Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.