Keeping it in the family: measures and drivers of portfolio brand cohesion

Abstract This research examines Portfolio Branding Cohesion (PBC) by applying Ward et al.’s (Int J Market Res, 2024) PBC metric (PBCM) to the United Kingdom’s packaged-goods sector, across nine categories, 125 brands, and 1023 products. On average, brands use their branding elements with 65% consistency. We observe significant variations in PBCM across categories, highlighting that visual cohesion depends on the brand. Factors such as an increasing number of visual elements, the presence of sub-brands, and whether the brand is a private label negatively impact PBCM, reducing cohesion across product portfolios. Our findings show that larger portfolios struggle to maintain cohesion, as expansion often introduces inconsistent design elements. Sub-brands typically weaken cohesion, which could affect long-term brand architecture. These insights offer practical implications for marketers, emphasising the need for careful portfolio management, thoughtful sub-brand strategies, and stronger visual identities for private label brands. Strengthening PBCM allows brands to build a cohesive visual identity, boosting consumer recognition and loyalty. In addition, by replicating and extending Ward et al.’s (2024) PBCM, we enhance its validity and reliability across broader contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Brand Management
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-025-00410-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keeping it in the family: measures and drivers of portfolio brand cohesion

Jenni Romaniuk, Ella Ward, Virginia Beal, John Dawes et al.
1 citations
Journal of Brand Management
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
2.07
article

Keeping it in the family: measures and drivers of portfolio brand cohesion

Jenni Romaniuk, Ella Ward, Virginia Beal, John Dawes, Giang Trinh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This research examines Portfolio Branding Cohesion (PBC) by applying Ward et al.’s (Int J Market Res, 2024) PBC metric (PBCM) to the United Kingdom’s packaged-goods sector, across nine categories, 125 brands, and 1023 products. On average, brands use their branding elements with 65% consistency. We observe significant variations in PBCM across categories, highlighting that visual cohesion depends on the brand. Factors such as an increasing number of visual elements, the presence of sub-brands, and whether the brand is a private label negatively impact PBCM, reducing cohesion across product portfolios. Our findings show that larger portfolios struggle to maintain cohesion, as expansion often introduces inconsistent design elements. Sub-brands typically weaken cohesion, which could affect long-term brand architecture. These insights offer practical implications for marketers, emphasising the need for careful portfolio management, thoughtful sub-brand strategies, and stronger visual identities for private label brands. Strengthening PBCM allows brands to build a cohesive visual identity, boosting consumer recognition and loyalty. In addition, by replicating and extending Ward et al.’s (2024) PBCM, we enhance its validity and reliability across broader contexts.

Journal of Brand ManagementVol. 33(2)
University of South Australia (AU)
University of South Australia
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.