Why people share misinformation on social media? An integration of affordance and flow theories

The widespread dissemination of misinformation on social media calls for an empirical investigation of why people share such content. By integrating affordance theory and flow theory, this study examines the underlying psychological mechanisms between social media affordances and misinformation sharing. With 533 valid questionnaires, the findings demonstrate that social media affordances (information accessibility, metavoicing and association) are positively associated with cognitive involvement and affective involvement, which then exert positive effects on users’ misinformation sharing. The results further reveal that emotional ability negatively moderates the relationship between affective involvement and misinformation sharing. Theoretically, our empirical findings extend prior studies by complementing the positive connotation of social media affordances and demonstrating that social media affordances can drive misinformation sharing through the mechanism of flow. Practically, the findings imply that attention should be paid to the design and management of social media to curtail misinformation sharing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05511-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why people share misinformation on social media? An integration of affordance and flow theories

Tailai Wu, Manli Wu, Ying Xiao
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
4.17
article

Why people share misinformation on social media? An integration of affordance and flow theories

Tailai Wu, Manli Wu, Ying Xiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The widespread dissemination of misinformation on social media calls for an empirical investigation of why people share such content. By integrating affordance theory and flow theory, this study examines the underlying psychological mechanisms between social media affordances and misinformation sharing. With 533 valid questionnaires, the findings demonstrate that social media affordances (information accessibility, metavoicing and association) are positively associated with cognitive involvement and affective involvement, which then exert positive effects on users’ misinformation sharing. The results further reveal that emotional ability negatively moderates the relationship between affective involvement and misinformation sharing. Theoretically, our empirical findings extend prior studies by complementing the positive connotation of social media affordances and demonstrating that social media affordances can drive misinformation sharing through the mechanism of flow. Practically, the findings imply that attention should be paid to the design and management of social media to curtail misinformation sharing.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Beijing Institute of Big Data Research (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Ministry of Education, India
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why people share misinformation on social media? An integration of affordance and flow theories — Tailai Wu, Manli Wu, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS