Contextual Intellectual Property Risk Management in Open Innovation for Software Companies

Open innovation (OI) is increasingly being recognized as a sustainable approach to fostering organizational growth and inter-organizational collaboration. In this context, safeguarding intellectual property (IP) is critical to ensuring the success of organizations engaged in OI. To develop effective IP- management strategies that adequately protect the IP that arises from OI activities, organizations must routinely evaluate IP-related risks. Studies reveal that the nature and extent of these risks vary significantly across organizational types, ranging from small, medium, and large enterprises to micro enterprises and start-ups. This research work puts forward tailored policies to manage IP effectively in software firms that participate in OI. To formulate these contextual policies, a survey was conducted, which involved more than 250 Fintechs in India, and represented various organizational segments. This research work utilized the open innovation intellectual property risk assessment tool to measure the IP risk score of these firms. The tool calculates the open innovation intellectual property risk score (OIIPRS), which categorizes companies into different levels of risk maturity as defined by the OI IP risk maturity model (OIIPRMM). This research work further employed qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to examine the factors influencing IP risks and their respective OIIPRS. Based on these insights, contextual IP-management policies were defined for various organizational segments. Software firms engaged in OI can adopt these tailored policies to mitigate their IP risks. Moreover, these policies serve as actionable guidelines for organizational management, which can be refined further to align with their specific IP-risk management requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccc64910.2025.11077267
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual Intellectual Property Risk Management in Open Innovation for Software Companies

D. Bijulal, A. S.
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Contextual Intellectual Property Risk Management in Open Innovation for Software Companies

D. Bijulal, A. S.
article en

Abstract

Open innovation (OI) is increasingly being recognized as a sustainable approach to fostering organizational growth and inter-organizational collaboration. In this context, safeguarding intellectual property (IP) is critical to ensuring the success of organizations engaged in OI. To develop effective IP- management strategies that adequately protect the IP that arises from OI activities, organizations must routinely evaluate IP-related risks. Studies reveal that the nature and extent of these risks vary significantly across organizational types, ranging from small, medium, and large enterprises to micro enterprises and start-ups. This research work puts forward tailored policies to manage IP effectively in software firms that participate in OI. To formulate these contextual policies, a survey was conducted, which involved more than 250 Fintechs in India, and represented various organizational segments. This research work utilized the open innovation intellectual property risk assessment tool to measure the IP risk score of these firms. The tool calculates the open innovation intellectual property risk score (OIIPRS), which categorizes companies into different levels of risk maturity as defined by the OI IP risk maturity model (OIIPRMM). This research work further employed qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to examine the factors influencing IP risks and their respective OIIPRS. Based on these insights, contextual IP-management policies were defined for various organizational segments. Software firms engaged in OI can adopt these tailored policies to mitigate their IP risks. Moreover, these policies serve as actionable guidelines for organizational management, which can be refined further to align with their specific IP-risk management requirements.

APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.