The virtual panopticon and the banalization of social risks: Qualitative evidence about algorithmic decision-making in Belgian municipalities

The development of algorithms and data in Belgium has received some attention in recent years, but philosophical considerations have been left aside from the discussion. This work aims to fill this gap by investigating how public reason can interact with algorithms in Belgium. The approach is twofold. First, we develop a theoretical framework to construct the concept of public reason, which is expected to be aligned with the current stage and development of technology. Second, we test this framework using data from public administration at subnational level for three Belgian local authorities, Liège (Wallonia), Namur (Wallonia), and Antwerp (Flanders). By means of a qualitative approach based on interviews, we find how algorithms and data reduce men into simplified singularities and then provoke a “banalization” of public reason. This banalization of public reason leads to a banalization of local social risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Economía y Finanzas
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32826/reyf.v3i7.387
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The virtual panopticon and the banalization of social risks: Qualitative evidence about algorithmic decision-making in Belgian municipalities

Sébastien Brunet, Truman Venters, Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo
Revista de Economía y Finanzas
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The virtual panopticon and the banalization of social risks: Qualitative evidence about algorithmic decision-making in Belgian municipalities

Sébastien Brunet, Truman Venters, Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo
article en

Abstract

The development of algorithms and data in Belgium has received some attention in recent years, but philosophical considerations have been left aside from the discussion. This work aims to fill this gap by investigating how public reason can interact with algorithms in Belgium. The approach is twofold. First, we develop a theoretical framework to construct the concept of public reason, which is expected to be aligned with the current stage and development of technology. Second, we test this framework using data from public administration at subnational level for three Belgian local authorities, Liège (Wallonia), Namur (Wallonia), and Antwerp (Flanders). By means of a qualitative approach based on interviews, we find how algorithms and data reduce men into simplified singularities and then provoke a “banalization” of public reason. This banalization of public reason leads to a banalization of local social risks.

Revista de Economía y FinanzasVol. 3(7)
University of Liège (BE), University of St Andrews (GB), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.