CRIMINALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL INACTION IN DIGITAL GOVERNANCE: RISKS TO THE SECURITY OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

The article presents a criminological analysis of the phenomenon of institutional inaction in the context of digital governance, in particular with regard to critical infrastructure facilities. The digital transformation of the public sector, despite the declared advantages - openness, automation, anti-corruption effect, - in practice does not exclude, and in some cases even intensifies, manifestations of official passivity, which leads to violations of citizens’ rights, blocking of investment projects, delaying administrative procedures and the formation of shadow mechanisms of influence. The author emphasizes that in the conditions of the availability of technical capabilities for decision-making, the inaction of government bodies acquires a new criminological quality: it is no longer just an organizational problem, but appears as a potentially punishable form of official misconduct. Based on the analysis of practice in the field of ensuring the security of critical infrastructure facilities in Ukraine, in particular examples of delayed approval of documentation, failure to enter data into digital registers, sabotage through electronic document management systems, the author introduces into scientific circulation the concepts of “digital official misconduct” and “regulatory imitation” as markers of the latest latent violations. The text justifies the need to form an updated approach to the qualification of institutional inaction in the digital environment, taking into account the obligations recorded in digital traces. Special attention is paid to the development of proposals for the criminalization of inaction that has consequences in the sphere of public interest, as well as the risks of abuse of such norms. The conclusions formulate directions for improving national legislation and prospects for further interdisciplinary research at the intersection of criminology, public administration and digital law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Alfred Nobel University Journal of Law
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32342/3041-2218-2025-1-10-7
Primary Topic
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRIMINALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL INACTION IN DIGITAL GOVERNANCE: RISKS TO THE SECURITY OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

Andriy V. Vavrysh
Alfred Nobel University Journal of Law
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
article

CRIMINALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL INACTION IN DIGITAL GOVERNANCE: RISKS TO THE SECURITY OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

Andriy V. Vavrysh
article en

Abstract

The article presents a criminological analysis of the phenomenon of institutional inaction in the context of digital governance, in particular with regard to critical infrastructure facilities. The digital transformation of the public sector, despite the declared advantages - openness, automation, anti-corruption effect, - in practice does not exclude, and in some cases even intensifies, manifestations of official passivity, which leads to violations of citizens’ rights, blocking of investment projects, delaying administrative procedures and the formation of shadow mechanisms of influence. The author emphasizes that in the conditions of the availability of technical capabilities for decision-making, the inaction of government bodies acquires a new criminological quality: it is no longer just an organizational problem, but appears as a potentially punishable form of official misconduct. Based on the analysis of practice in the field of ensuring the security of critical infrastructure facilities in Ukraine, in particular examples of delayed approval of documentation, failure to enter data into digital registers, sabotage through electronic document management systems, the author introduces into scientific circulation the concepts of “digital official misconduct” and “regulatory imitation” as markers of the latest latent violations. The text justifies the need to form an updated approach to the qualification of institutional inaction in the digital environment, taking into account the obligations recorded in digital traces. Special attention is paid to the development of proposals for the criminalization of inaction that has consequences in the sphere of public interest, as well as the risks of abuse of such norms. The conclusions formulate directions for improving national legislation and prospects for further interdisciplinary research at the intersection of criminology, public administration and digital law.

Alfred Nobel University Journal of LawVol. 1(10)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CRIMINALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL INACTION IN DIGITAL GOVERNANCE: RISKS TO THE SECURITY OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES — Andriy V. Vavrysh · Alfred Nobel University Journal of Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS