Empowering international PhD students: Generative AI, Ubuntu, and the decolonisation of academic communication

Generative AI (GenAI) provides distinct affordances that contribute meaningfully to learning. However, there are also several challenges, most notably ethical considerations. While much of the current research on GenAI in academia focuses on technical capabilities or ethical concerns, few studies have examined how GenAI can be leveraged to promote equity and inclusivity, particularly in academic communication. In this study, we adopt the theoretical lens of Ubuntu, a Southern African philosophy that emphasises interconnectedness and community, to reconceptualise GenAI as a democratising force. Five international PhD students in Education and their PhD supervisor (all multilingual users of English) explored their experiences of using GenAI. We used a collaborative autoethnographic approach, incorporating reflective prompting, individual writing, group sharing and refining, and group-based writing. We demonstrate that GenAI reshaped power dynamics and challenged academic hierarchies by providing real-time language support and improving academic writing clarity. This empowered us to participate in academic discourse, disrupting traditional gatekeeping mechanisms. By automating routine tasks, GenAI also shifted our academic focus from technical skills to intellectual contributions, fostering inclusivity and equity. This study highlights the potential of GenAI in terms of knowledge creation and academic discourse, particularly for doctoral scholars navigating linguistic and cultural barriers. Academia is predominantly Anglophone-centric, marginalising non-English-speaking scholars by imposing additional barriers to participation and recognition, perpetuating inequities in knowledge creation and dissemination. We argue that embracing GenAI can help to decolonise these academic practices, thereby promoting epistemic justice and creating a more equitable scholarly environment for all. • Reframes generative AI as a tool for decolonising academia. • Highlights generative AI's role in navigating academic and social spaces. • Advocates for generative AI as a tool to empower individual agency. • Explores international PhD students' use of generative AI using autoethnography. • Uses Ubuntu to champion an academic culture where equity and innovation co-exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Internet and Higher Education
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101038
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
60.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering international PhD students: Generative AI, Ubuntu, and the decolonisation of academic communication

Anak Agung Ayu Redi Pudyanti, Abdul Qawi Noori, Lynette Pretorius, Zhiheng Zhou et al.
4 citations
The Internet and Higher Education
Second Language Learning and Teaching
60.70
article

Empowering international PhD students: Generative AI, Ubuntu, and the decolonisation of academic communication

Anak Agung Ayu Redi Pudyanti, Abdul Qawi Noori, Lynette Pretorius, Zhiheng Zhou, Zhi Li, Huy-Hoang Huynh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) provides distinct affordances that contribute meaningfully to learning. However, there are also several challenges, most notably ethical considerations. While much of the current research on GenAI in academia focuses on technical capabilities or ethical concerns, few studies have examined how GenAI can be leveraged to promote equity and inclusivity, particularly in academic communication. In this study, we adopt the theoretical lens of Ubuntu, a Southern African philosophy that emphasises interconnectedness and community, to reconceptualise GenAI as a democratising force. Five international PhD students in Education and their PhD supervisor (all multilingual users of English) explored their experiences of using GenAI. We used a collaborative autoethnographic approach, incorporating reflective prompting, individual writing, group sharing and refining, and group-based writing. We demonstrate that GenAI reshaped power dynamics and challenged academic hierarchies by providing real-time language support and improving academic writing clarity. This empowered us to participate in academic discourse, disrupting traditional gatekeeping mechanisms. By automating routine tasks, GenAI also shifted our academic focus from technical skills to intellectual contributions, fostering inclusivity and equity. This study highlights the potential of GenAI in terms of knowledge creation and academic discourse, particularly for doctoral scholars navigating linguistic and cultural barriers. Academia is predominantly Anglophone-centric, marginalising non-English-speaking scholars by imposing additional barriers to participation and recognition, perpetuating inequities in knowledge creation and dissemination. We argue that embracing GenAI can help to decolonise these academic practices, thereby promoting epistemic justice and creating a more equitable scholarly environment for all. • Reframes generative AI as a tool for decolonising academia. • Highlights generative AI's role in navigating academic and social spaces. • Advocates for generative AI as a tool to empower individual agency. • Explores international PhD students' use of generative AI using autoethnography. • Uses Ubuntu to champion an academic culture where equity and innovation co-exist.

The Internet and Higher EducationVol. 67
Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
60.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.