Why Interest Groups With Divergent Goals Collaborate: Evidence From Climate Regulation

ABSTRACT Why do interest groups with contrasting interests and policy goals work together? I present a theory of collaborative policy production and show that interest groups can achieve higher policy gains through collaboration, even though their ideal policy goals may diverge significantly. To test theoretical results, I introduce original measurement strategies that reveal systematic patterns in which firms and environmental groups invest in joint efforts to improve fine‐grained details of policy to achieve greenhouse gas emissions targets. The analysis, using public comments spanning 2010–2020, demonstrates that comments written jointly by environmental groups and firms contain more information that can contribute to the quality of policy implementation than individual efforts alone, despite compromises on policy preferences. These findings highlight the hidden dynamics of regulatory politics, wherein divergent political goals are reconciled for high‐quality policy implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics and Politics
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70009
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Interest Groups With Divergent Goals Collaborate: Evidence From Climate Regulation

Dahyun Choi
Economics and Politics
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Why Interest Groups With Divergent Goals Collaborate: Evidence From Climate Regulation

Dahyun Choi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Why do interest groups with contrasting interests and policy goals work together? I present a theory of collaborative policy production and show that interest groups can achieve higher policy gains through collaboration, even though their ideal policy goals may diverge significantly. To test theoretical results, I introduce original measurement strategies that reveal systematic patterns in which firms and environmental groups invest in joint efforts to improve fine‐grained details of policy to achieve greenhouse gas emissions targets. The analysis, using public comments spanning 2010–2020, demonstrates that comments written jointly by environmental groups and firms contain more information that can contribute to the quality of policy implementation than individual efforts alone, despite compromises on policy preferences. These findings highlight the hidden dynamics of regulatory politics, wherein divergent political goals are reconciled for high‐quality policy implementation.

Economics and PoliticsVol. 38(1)
Princeton University (US)
Brown University, Princeton University, Copenhagen Business School
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.