Understanding Philosophical Media: From Philosophy of Technology to “Technologies of Philosophy”

Abstract In this paper, we introduce the issue of the “technologies of philosophy” into the philosophy of technology discourse. To this end, we rework some assumptions in the contemporary philosophy of technology, particularly postphenomenology, building on the idea that technology is essential to human existence. In Sect. 1, we outline three core roles technology plays in the human lifeform: technological support, mediation and constitution. In Sect. 2, we highlight the importance of extending this model from bodily to cognitive technologies, drawing on recent approaches that advocate for this perspective. In Sect. 3, we propose to apply this framework to philosophical reflection itself, emphasizing the medial oblivion that has affected philosophical self-analysis and how it may foster implicit or explicit forms of technological determinism—particularly concerning the role of alphabetic writing. To address this neglect and counteract the deterministic tendency, we submit a classification of the technologies of philosophy, examining them from both a descriptive (Sect. 4) and a (moderately) normative (Sect. 5) standpoint. Descriptively, we suggest that not only words but also images, the body and things can be considered philosophical media proper. Normatively, we argue that digital technologies, which are nowadays deeply influencing our modes of knowledge production and transmission, challenge the idea that writing is the sole suitable medium for philosophical work, prompting a reconsideration of how philosophy could be done. Thus, our aim is to advocate for a more diverse, potentially “post-alphabetic” view of philosophy in the digital age, one that seeks to explore how engaging with various technologies could lead to new insights into the nature of philosophy itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00937-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Philosophical Media: From Philosophy of Technology to “Technologies of Philosophy”

Giacomo Pezzano, Marco Pavanini
3 citations
Philosophy & Technology
Digital Media and Philosophy
5.08
article

Understanding Philosophical Media: From Philosophy of Technology to “Technologies of Philosophy”

Giacomo Pezzano, Marco Pavanini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we introduce the issue of the “technologies of philosophy” into the philosophy of technology discourse. To this end, we rework some assumptions in the contemporary philosophy of technology, particularly postphenomenology, building on the idea that technology is essential to human existence. In Sect. 1, we outline three core roles technology plays in the human lifeform: technological support, mediation and constitution. In Sect. 2, we highlight the importance of extending this model from bodily to cognitive technologies, drawing on recent approaches that advocate for this perspective. In Sect. 3, we propose to apply this framework to philosophical reflection itself, emphasizing the medial oblivion that has affected philosophical self-analysis and how it may foster implicit or explicit forms of technological determinism—particularly concerning the role of alphabetic writing. To address this neglect and counteract the deterministic tendency, we submit a classification of the technologies of philosophy, examining them from both a descriptive (Sect. 4) and a (moderately) normative (Sect. 5) standpoint. Descriptively, we suggest that not only words but also images, the body and things can be considered philosophical media proper. Normatively, we argue that digital technologies, which are nowadays deeply influencing our modes of knowledge production and transmission, challenge the idea that writing is the sole suitable medium for philosophical work, prompting a reconsideration of how philosophy could be done. Thus, our aim is to advocate for a more diverse, potentially “post-alphabetic” view of philosophy in the digital age, one that seeks to explore how engaging with various technologies could lead to new insights into the nature of philosophy itself.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(3)
Department of Medical Sciences (BY), University of Turin (IT)
Compagnia di San Paolo, European Commission, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Università degli Studi di Torino
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Media and Philosophy
5.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.