Do Criminalization Policies Impact Local Homelessness?

ABSTRACT Local criminalization policies draw on the logic of deterrence to levy costs on individuals who engage in behaviors that are closely associated with various public concerns, such as those criminalizing behaviors associated with homelessness, thereby potentially reducing community‐level costs. Yet, it is unclear whether the presence of these policies can be relied upon to reduce the frequency of a social crisis within a local municipality. To answer this question, this article utilizes a difference‐in‐difference design to determine whether passing an ordinance criminalizing behaviors closely related to homelessness produces a subsequent long‐term decrease in homelessness within a community, thereby generating the expected community‐level cost savings. Contrary to the deterrence logic, the results indicate that these local criminalization ordinances cannot be relied upon to reduce the social crisis rate (i.e., the number of people experiencing homeless) and therefore do not provide the intended community‐level benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Criminalization Policies Impact Local Homelessness?

Andrew Sullivan, Hannah Lebovits
1 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Homelessness and Social Issues
2.82
article

Do Criminalization Policies Impact Local Homelessness?

Andrew Sullivan, Hannah Lebovits
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Local criminalization policies draw on the logic of deterrence to levy costs on individuals who engage in behaviors that are closely associated with various public concerns, such as those criminalizing behaviors associated with homelessness, thereby potentially reducing community‐level costs. Yet, it is unclear whether the presence of these policies can be relied upon to reduce the frequency of a social crisis within a local municipality. To answer this question, this article utilizes a difference‐in‐difference design to determine whether passing an ordinance criminalizing behaviors closely related to homelessness produces a subsequent long‐term decrease in homelessness within a community, thereby generating the expected community‐level cost savings. Contrary to the deterrence logic, the results indicate that these local criminalization ordinances cannot be relied upon to reduce the social crisis rate (i.e., the number of people experiencing homeless) and therefore do not provide the intended community‐level benefit.

Policy Studies Journal
University of Central Florida (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Homelessness and Social Issues
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Criminalization Policies Impact Local Homelessness? — Andrew Sullivan, Hannah Lebovits · Policy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS