Global perspectives, local solutions: Improving human–predator coexistence through collaboration, meaningful experiences and cross‐cultural knowledge

Abstract Human–predator coexistence is a complex and dynamic relationship influenced by a variety of social–ecological factors. Recognising conflict as an inherent aspect of coexistence, rather than merely a problem to be solved, is crucial. This literature review examines how a range of factors contributes to human coexistence with predators. A systematic review of 76 peer‐reviewed articles from 33 countries provides valuable insights into the complexities associated with these factors across different contexts. Collaboration among social actors is crucial for addressing cultural tensions, increasing trust in state agencies and reaching agreements for coexistence practices. While material benefits (e.g. ecotourism, financial compensation) are often emphasised, relational and intrinsic values, emotions and meaningful personal experiences play an even greater role in fostering coexistence. Acknowledgment of positive predator attributes, mutual benefits, cultural significance and deep human–wildlife connections may help shape perceptions of predators in a culturally informed manner. Further appropriate and respectful cross‐cultural research that amplifies Indigenous voices and knowledge is essential for understanding the nuances of human–predator interactions across diverse socio‐economic and ecological contexts. Comprehensive management to improve human–predator relationships needs to consider ecological contexts alongside the cultural norms and priorities of local communities. This approach will enable legitimate, situated and long‐term coexistence practices and solutions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70098
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global perspectives, local solutions: Improving human–predator coexistence through collaboration, meaningful experiences and cross‐cultural knowledge

José Tomás Ibarra, Rocío Almuna, Peter Speldewinde, Stephen Donald Hopper et al.
People and Nature
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Global perspectives, local solutions: Improving human–predator coexistence through collaboration, meaningful experiences and cross‐cultural knowledge

José Tomás Ibarra, Rocío Almuna, Peter Speldewinde, Stephen Donald Hopper, Cristina E. Ramalho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Human–predator coexistence is a complex and dynamic relationship influenced by a variety of social–ecological factors. Recognising conflict as an inherent aspect of coexistence, rather than merely a problem to be solved, is crucial. This literature review examines how a range of factors contributes to human coexistence with predators. A systematic review of 76 peer‐reviewed articles from 33 countries provides valuable insights into the complexities associated with these factors across different contexts. Collaboration among social actors is crucial for addressing cultural tensions, increasing trust in state agencies and reaching agreements for coexistence practices. While material benefits (e.g. ecotourism, financial compensation) are often emphasised, relational and intrinsic values, emotions and meaningful personal experiences play an even greater role in fostering coexistence. Acknowledgment of positive predator attributes, mutual benefits, cultural significance and deep human–wildlife connections may help shape perceptions of predators in a culturally informed manner. Further appropriate and respectful cross‐cultural research that amplifies Indigenous voices and knowledge is essential for understanding the nuances of human–predator interactions across diverse socio‐economic and ecological contexts. Comprehensive management to improve human–predator relationships needs to consider ecological contexts alongside the cultural norms and priorities of local communities. This approach will enable legitimate, situated and long‐term coexistence practices and solutions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 7(9)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), The University of Western Australia (AU), Center of Applied Ecology & Sustainability (CL), Peregrine Power (United States) (US), The Peregrine Fund (US), Universidad de Magallanes (CL)
Rufford Foundation, Peregrine Fund, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.