Evaluation of the Effects of Pomegranate Peel Aqueous Extract Against <i>Leishmania major</i>: A Randomized and Controlled Trial

Background: Leishmaniasis remains a major global health issue, with current treatments often limited by side effects, drug resistance, prolonged treatment durations, and high costs. These challenges have driven interest in alternative therapies. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the in vitro and in vivo effects of pomegranate peel aqueous extract against Leishmania major. Methods: The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial with a 1:1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Forty healthy female BALB/c mice (6 - 8 weeks old, 40 - 50 g) were subcutaneously infected with 2 × 106 L. major promastigotes. Once lesions developed, mice were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 8 per group). Randomization and blinding of outcome assessors were employed to minimize bias. Four groups received topical applications of pomegranate peel aqueous extract at concentrations of 2.5%, 5%, 20%, or 40%, while the control group received physiological serum. Treatments were applied directly to the lesion using a sterile cotton swab, twice daily for 30 days. The primary outcome was the change in lesion size, measured with a digital caliper at baseline and day 30. Secondary outcomes included the in vitro viability of L. major promastigotes after 72-hour exposure to extract concentrations (0.1 - 0.9 mg/mL), evaluated by trypan blue exclusion assay using a Neubauer chamber. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post-treatment lesion sizes within groups, and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc analysis compared between groups. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The extract inhibited L. major promastigote growth at concentrations between 0.3 and 0.9 mg/mL in vitro. In vivo, lesion size reductions were dose-dependent. Treatment with 20% extract led to a 27% reduction in lesion size (from 0.37 ± 0.03 cm to 0.27 ± 0.03 cm; mean difference = 0.10 cm, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.13 cm, P < 0.05). The most significant effect was observed with 40% extract, resulting in an 84.7% reduction in lesion size (from 4.90 ± 0.75 cm to 0.75 ± 0.11 cm; mean difference = 4.15 cm, 95% CI: 3.85 - 4.45 cm, P < 0.05). Lower concentrations (2.5% and 5%) showed no statistically significant difference compared to the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Pomegranate peel aqueous extract appears to be a promising treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). However, the study has several limitations, including the absence of a standard anti-leishmanial drug as a positive control, potential imprecision in dosing due to percentage-based concentrations, and the use of a crude extract without quantification of active compounds. Further studies should compare extract types and identify specific therapeutic components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-158923
Primary Topic
Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Effects of Pomegranate Peel Aqueous Extract Against Leishmania major: A Randomized and Controlled Trial

Tooran Nayeri, Mir‐Jamal Hosseini, Naser Nazari
Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
article

Evaluation of the Effects of Pomegranate Peel Aqueous Extract Against Leishmania major: A Randomized and Controlled Trial

Tooran Nayeri, Mir‐Jamal Hosseini, Naser Nazari
article en

Abstract

Background: Leishmaniasis remains a major global health issue, with current treatments often limited by side effects, drug resistance, prolonged treatment durations, and high costs. These challenges have driven interest in alternative therapies. Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the in vitro and in vivo effects of pomegranate peel aqueous extract against Leishmania major. Methods: The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial with a 1:1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Forty healthy female BALB/c mice (6 - 8 weeks old, 40 - 50 g) were subcutaneously infected with 2 × 106 L. major promastigotes. Once lesions developed, mice were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 8 per group). Randomization and blinding of outcome assessors were employed to minimize bias. Four groups received topical applications of pomegranate peel aqueous extract at concentrations of 2.5%, 5%, 20%, or 40%, while the control group received physiological serum. Treatments were applied directly to the lesion using a sterile cotton swab, twice daily for 30 days. The primary outcome was the change in lesion size, measured with a digital caliper at baseline and day 30. Secondary outcomes included the in vitro viability of L. major promastigotes after 72-hour exposure to extract concentrations (0.1 - 0.9 mg/mL), evaluated by trypan blue exclusion assay using a Neubauer chamber. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post-treatment lesion sizes within groups, and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc analysis compared between groups. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The extract inhibited L. major promastigote growth at concentrations between 0.3 and 0.9 mg/mL in vitro. In vivo, lesion size reductions were dose-dependent. Treatment with 20% extract led to a 27% reduction in lesion size (from 0.37 ± 0.03 cm to 0.27 ± 0.03 cm; mean difference = 0.10 cm, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.13 cm, P < 0.05). The most significant effect was observed with 40% extract, resulting in an 84.7% reduction in lesion size (from 4.90 ± 0.75 cm to 0.75 ± 0.11 cm; mean difference = 4.15 cm, 95% CI: 3.85 - 4.45 cm, P < 0.05). Lower concentrations (2.5% and 5%) showed no statistically significant difference compared to the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Pomegranate peel aqueous extract appears to be a promising treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). However, the study has several limitations, including the absence of a standard anti-leishmanial drug as a positive control, potential imprecision in dosing due to percentage-based concentrations, and the use of a crude extract without quantification of active compounds. Further studies should compare extract types and identify specific therapeutic components.

Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical SciencesVol. 29(2)
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR), Dezful University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.