Earthquake Early Warning Scenarios for Alaska

ABSTRACT Alaska presents several challenges for earthquake early warning (EEW) systems. These include the presence of offshore earthquakes, transform boundaries, and crustal faults extending hundreds of kilometers, deep earthquakes, and a complicated coastline. This variety, combined with population centers spread far apart, makes it challenging to anticipate early warning performance and design systems accordingly. As Alaska begins to plan for early warning, we present here a set of scenarios intended to inform these activities. Our objective is to envision how, and how well, early warning will function in Alaska. We present warning time estimates for groups of deterministic earthquake scenarios along known faults. These scenarios demonstrate how changes in source characteristics, such as magnitude, depth, location, and fault style, impact the timeliness of warnings and associated ground motions. We combine source time models and travel times for the current seismic network to model detection and alert times. We compare the resulting warning times and peak ground motions to determine the warning effectiveness. Our results demonstrate that even the current network geometry is theoretically capable of providing 0–20 s of warning for intensity 6 for many shallow crustal earthquakes. Increasing the station density can add another 5–15 s to these warning times and provide positive warning times for shaking of intensity 8. Deep and offshore earthquakes benefit less directly from increased station density. For these earthquakes, it is theoretically possible to provide positive warning times for most shaking of intensity 8. Informed by these results, we discuss where we expect an EEW system to excel and what challenges should be tackled to improve other areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Earthquake Early Warning Scenarios for Alaska

Alexander M. Fozkos, M. E. West
1 citations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
2.48
article

Earthquake Early Warning Scenarios for Alaska

Alexander M. Fozkos, M. E. West
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Alaska presents several challenges for earthquake early warning (EEW) systems. These include the presence of offshore earthquakes, transform boundaries, and crustal faults extending hundreds of kilometers, deep earthquakes, and a complicated coastline. This variety, combined with population centers spread far apart, makes it challenging to anticipate early warning performance and design systems accordingly. As Alaska begins to plan for early warning, we present here a set of scenarios intended to inform these activities. Our objective is to envision how, and how well, early warning will function in Alaska. We present warning time estimates for groups of deterministic earthquake scenarios along known faults. These scenarios demonstrate how changes in source characteristics, such as magnitude, depth, location, and fault style, impact the timeliness of warnings and associated ground motions. We combine source time models and travel times for the current seismic network to model detection and alert times. We compare the resulting warning times and peak ground motions to determine the warning effectiveness. Our results demonstrate that even the current network geometry is theoretically capable of providing 0–20 s of warning for intensity 6 for many shallow crustal earthquakes. Increasing the station density can add another 5–15 s to these warning times and provide positive warning times for shaking of intensity 8. Deep and offshore earthquakes benefit less directly from increased station density. For these earthquakes, it is theoretically possible to provide positive warning times for most shaking of intensity 8. Informed by these results, we discuss where we expect an EEW system to excel and what challenges should be tackled to improve other areas.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 115(5)
University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Earthquake Early Warning Scenarios for Alaska — Alexander M. Fozkos, M. E. West · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS