Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study

Our purpose is to evaluate the binocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in a presbyopic population and compare the results obtained with four different simultaneous-vision center-near multifocal contact lens (MCL) designs for distance vision under two illumination conditions. Additionally, chromatic CSF (red-green and blue-yellow) was evaluated. A randomized crossover pilot study was conducted. Four daily disposable lens designs, based on simultaneous-vision and center-near correction, were compared. The achromatic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured binocularly using the CSV1000e test under two lighting conditions: room light on and off. Chromatic CSF was measured using the OptoPad-CSF test. Comparison of achromatic results with room lighting showed a statistically significant difference only for 3 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.03) between the baseline visit (with spectacles) and all MCLs. Comparison of achromatic results without room lighting showed no statistically significant differences between the baseline and all MCLs for any spatial frequency (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). Comparison of CSF-T results showed a statistically significant difference only for 4 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Comparison of CSF-D results showed no statistically significant difference for all frequencies (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). The MCL designs analyzed provided satisfactory achromatic contrast sensitivity results for distance vision, similar to those obtained with spectacles, with no remarkable differences between designs. Chromatic contrast sensitivity for the red-green and blue-yellow mechanisms revealed some differences from the baseline that should be further investigated in future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vision
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030067
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study

Dolores de Fez Sáiz, Elena Martínez‐Plaza, Ainhoa Molina‐Martín, Kevin J. Mena-Guevara et al.
Vision
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study

Dolores de Fez Sáiz, Elena Martínez‐Plaza, Ainhoa Molina‐Martín, Kevin J. Mena-Guevara, Violeta Gómez‐Vicente, David P. Piñero
article en

Abstract

Our purpose is to evaluate the binocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in a presbyopic population and compare the results obtained with four different simultaneous-vision center-near multifocal contact lens (MCL) designs for distance vision under two illumination conditions. Additionally, chromatic CSF (red-green and blue-yellow) was evaluated. A randomized crossover pilot study was conducted. Four daily disposable lens designs, based on simultaneous-vision and center-near correction, were compared. The achromatic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured binocularly using the CSV1000e test under two lighting conditions: room light on and off. Chromatic CSF was measured using the OptoPad-CSF test. Comparison of achromatic results with room lighting showed a statistically significant difference only for 3 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.03) between the baseline visit (with spectacles) and all MCLs. Comparison of achromatic results without room lighting showed no statistically significant differences between the baseline and all MCLs for any spatial frequency (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). Comparison of CSF-T results showed a statistically significant difference only for 4 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Comparison of CSF-D results showed no statistically significant difference for all frequencies (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). The MCL designs analyzed provided satisfactory achromatic contrast sensitivity results for distance vision, similar to those obtained with spectacles, with no remarkable differences between designs. Chromatic contrast sensitivity for the red-green and blue-yellow mechanisms revealed some differences from the baseline that should be further investigated in future studies.

VisionVol. 9(3)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), University of Alicante (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.