Loneliness as a Mediator in the Association Between Food Insecurity and Multiple Sleep Problems: Evidence From the 2021/22 UK Household Longitudinal Study
PurposeThis study examines whether loneliness mediates the association between food insecurity and multiple sleep problems.DesignQuantitative, cross-sectional.SettingData were drawn from the 2021/22 wave of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, which-for the first time in the main survey-included a validated measure of food insecurity.SubjectsThe analytic sample included 21,650 individuals aged 18 and older.MeasuresSleep problems were assessed across six dimensions using items from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Loneliness was measured using the UCLA three-Item Loneliness Scale. Food insecurity was assessed using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale. Sociodemographic variables were included as covariates.AnalysisOrdinary Least Squares and logistic regression models were used to examine associations between food insecurity and sleep outcomes. The Karlson-Holm-Breen method was employed to assess mediation by loneliness.ResultsIndividuals experiencing food insecurity reported worse outcomes across all sleep problems compared to those without food insecurity (from b = .154, <i>P</i> < .001 for greater daytime dysfunction to b = .470, <i>P</i> < .001 for longer sleep latency; OR = 2.531, <i>P</i> < .001 for short sleep duration). Loneliness mediated all associations, explaining between 14.75% and 27.24% of the total effect.ConclusionPublic health interventions that address both food insecurity and loneliness may help improve sleep health.
Authors
- Lei Chai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-7059)
- Zhuofei Lu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-3801)
Institutions
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Health Promotion
- Published
- 2025-08-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251366077
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.82