Regulator of G protein signaling 2 as a suppressor of sphingosine-1-phosphate 2– and 3–mediated signaling in colon cancer cells

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 and 3 (S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>) are G protein-coupled receptors that mediate extracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling into cells. S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> are highly expressed in colon cancer cells, but their roles in cancer progression-related cellular phenotypes are not well understood. Recent studies suggest that regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) interacts with G protein-coupled receptors, either directly or indirectly, to regulate their signaling. However, the precise role of RGS2 in S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> signaling remains uninvestigated. In this study, we examined the interaction of RGS2 with S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis and assessed its impact on S1P<sub>2</sub>- and S1P<sub>3</sub>-mediated signaling in 293T and HCT116 cells. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis revealed that RGS2 and Gα subunits simultaneously bind to S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>. Furthermore, in the presence of these receptors, RGS2 translocated from the cytoplasm to the cell membrane. These interactions and membrane translocation were not observed with the RGS1 negative control, highlighting the specificity of RGS2 for S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>. RGS2 expression inhibited the activation of Gαi, Gαq, and Gα12, key signaling pathways mediated by S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>. S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> activation significantly enhanced cell migration and the expression of cancer-associated genes, effects that were effectively suppressed by RGS2 expression. In contrast, RGS1 failed to inhibit S1P<sub>2</sub>- and S1P<sub>3</sub>-mediated Gα signaling as well as downstream effects, such as enhanced cell migration and cancer-associated gene expression. Our findings show that RGS2 suppresses S1P2- and S1P3-mediated cancer-associated cellular phenotypes by interacting with these receptors and inhibiting Gα-mediated signaling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110554
Primary Topic
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulator of G protein signaling 2 as a suppressor of sphingosine-1-phosphate 2– and 3–mediated signaling in colon cancer cells

Sungho Ghil, Nahyun Kim, Jaejun Eo
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
article

Regulator of G protein signaling 2 as a suppressor of sphingosine-1-phosphate 2– and 3–mediated signaling in colon cancer cells

Sungho Ghil, Nahyun Kim, Jaejun Eo
article en

Abstract

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 and 3 (S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>) are G protein-coupled receptors that mediate extracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling into cells. S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> are highly expressed in colon cancer cells, but their roles in cancer progression-related cellular phenotypes are not well understood. Recent studies suggest that regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) interacts with G protein-coupled receptors, either directly or indirectly, to regulate their signaling. However, the precise role of RGS2 in S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> signaling remains uninvestigated. In this study, we examined the interaction of RGS2 with S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis and assessed its impact on S1P<sub>2</sub>- and S1P<sub>3</sub>-mediated signaling in 293T and HCT116 cells. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis revealed that RGS2 and Gα subunits simultaneously bind to S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>. Furthermore, in the presence of these receptors, RGS2 translocated from the cytoplasm to the cell membrane. These interactions and membrane translocation were not observed with the RGS1 negative control, highlighting the specificity of RGS2 for S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>. RGS2 expression inhibited the activation of Gαi, Gαq, and Gα12, key signaling pathways mediated by S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub>. S1P<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>3</sub> activation significantly enhanced cell migration and the expression of cancer-associated genes, effects that were effectively suppressed by RGS2 expression. In contrast, RGS1 failed to inhibit S1P<sub>2</sub>- and S1P<sub>3</sub>-mediated Gα signaling as well as downstream effects, such as enhanced cell migration and cancer-associated gene expression. Our findings show that RGS2 suppresses S1P2- and S1P3-mediated cancer-associated cellular phenotypes by interacting with these receptors and inhibiting Gα-mediated signaling.

Journal of Biological ChemistryVol. 301(9)
Kyonggi University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Kyonggi University, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.