Practical Machine Learning Strategies 4: Using Neural Networks to Replicate Proton and <sup>13</sup>C NMR Chemical Shifts Obtained from ωB97X-D/6-31G* Density Functional Calculations

Described are neural networks that accurately reproduce proton and <sup>13</sup>C chemical shifts obtained from ωB97X-D/6-31G*//ωB97X-D/6-31G* density functional model GIAO calculations. They support uncharged, closed-shell molecules comprising H, C, N, O, F, S, Cl, and Br. Development involved training to ≈2.7 million equilibrium geometry and chemical shift calculations for a diverse collection of organic molecules (including synthetic drugs and natural products). Referenced to ωB97X-D/6-31G*//ωB97X-D/6-31G* calculations, chemical shifts from neural networks for 601 marine natural products show RMS errors of 0.05 ppm (proton) and 0.76 ppm (<sup>13</sup>C). RMS errors of 0.09 ppm (proton) and 1.02 ppm (<sup>13</sup>C) shifts result when equilibrium geometries from a previously described "estimated ωB97X-D/6-31G*" neural network model (trained to reproduce ωB97X-D/6-31G* geometries) are utilized. A second assessment of experimental <sup>13</sup>C chemical shifts for 246 natural products is provided. Using neural network models to provide both geometries and chemical shifts: 45% of <sup>13</sup>C shifts reproduce experimental values within 1 ppm, 73% within 2 ppm, and 86% within 3 ppm. Utilizing neural network models for both equilibrium geometries and chemical shifts reduces the computational time required for accurate proton and <sup>13</sup>C chemical shifts from tens to hundreds of minutes to just a few seconds per molecule.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5c00927
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Machine Learning Strategies 4: Using Neural Networks to Replicate Proton and 13C NMR Chemical Shifts Obtained from ωB97X-D/6-31G* Density Functional Calculations

William Sean Ohlinger, Bernard Deppmeier, Warren J. Hehre, Philip E. Klunzinger et al.
3 citations
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.55
article

Practical Machine Learning Strategies 4: Using Neural Networks to Replicate Proton and 13C NMR Chemical Shifts Obtained from ωB97X-D/6-31G* Density Functional Calculations

William Sean Ohlinger, Bernard Deppmeier, Warren J. Hehre, Philip E. Klunzinger, Thomas Hehre
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Described are neural networks that accurately reproduce proton and <sup>13</sup>C chemical shifts obtained from ωB97X-D/6-31G*//ωB97X-D/6-31G* density functional model GIAO calculations. They support uncharged, closed-shell molecules comprising H, C, N, O, F, S, Cl, and Br. Development involved training to ≈2.7 million equilibrium geometry and chemical shift calculations for a diverse collection of organic molecules (including synthetic drugs and natural products). Referenced to ωB97X-D/6-31G*//ωB97X-D/6-31G* calculations, chemical shifts from neural networks for 601 marine natural products show RMS errors of 0.05 ppm (proton) and 0.76 ppm (<sup>13</sup>C). RMS errors of 0.09 ppm (proton) and 1.02 ppm (<sup>13</sup>C) shifts result when equilibrium geometries from a previously described "estimated ωB97X-D/6-31G*" neural network model (trained to reproduce ωB97X-D/6-31G* geometries) are utilized. A second assessment of experimental <sup>13</sup>C chemical shifts for 246 natural products is provided. Using neural network models to provide both geometries and chemical shifts: 45% of <sup>13</sup>C shifts reproduce experimental values within 1 ppm, 73% within 2 ppm, and 86% within 3 ppm. Utilizing neural network models for both equilibrium geometries and chemical shifts reduces the computational time required for accurate proton and <sup>13</sup>C chemical shifts from tens to hundreds of minutes to just a few seconds per molecule.

The Journal of Organic ChemistryVol. 90(32)
Dermatology Research and Education Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practical Machine Learning Strategies 4: Using Neural Networks to Replicate Proton and <sup>13</sup>C NMR Chemical Shifts Obtained from ωB97X-D/6-31G* Density Functional Calculations — William Sean Ohlinger, Bernard Deppmeier, et al. · The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS