Do sell-side analysts’ recommendations consider business strategy in their evaluation? What is the role of corporate governance?

Abstract This study investigates whether sell-side analysts incorporate business strategy considerations into their stock recommendations and examines the moderating role of corporate governance in this relationship. Utilizing a dataset from Capital IQ S&P and BoardEX covering UK firms from 2007 to 2018, we employ multiple regression methodologies to demonstrate that firms with well-defined business strategies (e.g., prospector vs. defender orientations) receive systematically more favorable analyst recommendations. Our findings further reveal that robust corporate governance mechanisms amplify the positive association between strategic positioning and analyst sentiment. These results suggest that analysts value strategic clarity alongside governance quality when formulating recommendations, offering practical insights for firms seeking to optimize their market positioning and for investors integrating analyst research into decision-making frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management & Governance
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-025-09750-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do sell-side analysts’ recommendations consider business strategy in their evaluation? What is the role of corporate governance?

Abdulsamad Alazzani
1 citations
Journal of Management & Governance
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

Do sell-side analysts’ recommendations consider business strategy in their evaluation? What is the role of corporate governance?

Abdulsamad Alazzani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates whether sell-side analysts incorporate business strategy considerations into their stock recommendations and examines the moderating role of corporate governance in this relationship. Utilizing a dataset from Capital IQ S&P and BoardEX covering UK firms from 2007 to 2018, we employ multiple regression methodologies to demonstrate that firms with well-defined business strategies (e.g., prospector vs. defender orientations) receive systematically more favorable analyst recommendations. Our findings further reveal that robust corporate governance mechanisms amplify the positive association between strategic positioning and analyst sentiment. These results suggest that analysts value strategic clarity alongside governance quality when formulating recommendations, offering practical insights for firms seeking to optimize their market positioning and for investors integrating analyst research into decision-making frameworks.

Journal of Management & Governance
Qatar University (QA)
University of Bristol, Macquarie University, Curtin University of Technology, Qatar University, Qatar National Library
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do sell-side analysts’ recommendations consider business strategy in their evaluation? What is the role of corporate governance? — Abdulsamad Alazzani · Journal of Management & Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS