Immigrant Nations and the Limits of the Right to Exclude

ABSTRACT This article challenges the liberal nationalist Right to Exclude View , which holds that states may exclude immigrants to protect national self‐determination. It critiques the underlying dichotomy between native nations and immigrant communities, arguing that resident immigrant groups and diasporas possess the key features of nations—shared beliefs, historical continuity, collective agency, territorial attachment and a public culture. These communities form ‘new immigrant nations’ with political agency and institutional presence in destination countries. As such, they are entitled to rights similar to those of native nations, including the right to influence immigration policies and invite fellow immigrants. The paper concludes that if immigrant groups are nations, then the moral and political grounds for exclusion are significantly weakened, calling for a rethinking of nationalist justifications for immigration restrictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nations and Nationalism
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.70010
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immigrant Nations and the Limits of the Right to Exclude

Gianfranco Pellegrino
Nations and Nationalism
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Immigrant Nations and the Limits of the Right to Exclude

Gianfranco Pellegrino
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article challenges the liberal nationalist Right to Exclude View , which holds that states may exclude immigrants to protect national self‐determination. It critiques the underlying dichotomy between native nations and immigrant communities, arguing that resident immigrant groups and diasporas possess the key features of nations—shared beliefs, historical continuity, collective agency, territorial attachment and a public culture. These communities form ‘new immigrant nations’ with political agency and institutional presence in destination countries. As such, they are entitled to rights similar to those of native nations, including the right to influence immigration policies and invite fellow immigrants. The paper concludes that if immigrant groups are nations, then the moral and political grounds for exclusion are significantly weakened, calling for a rethinking of nationalist justifications for immigration restrictions.

Nations and Nationalism
Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.