Navigating the black box: Operational lenses for AI-enabled drone governance

Drones equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) now deliver medical supplies in remote regions, monitor environmental changes, and conduct military operations. Worldwide, regulators are racing to layer broad AI rules with drone-specific safety standards; however, the resulting patchwork is still fragmented and unevenly enforced. As AI decision-making processes are often opaque, governance approaches that rely on understanding internal system mechanics face significant challenges. In this review, we examine the existing governance landscape on AI-enabled drones and demonstrate why drones that share identical hardware and AI architecture raise different ethical and legal questions depending on their deployment context. By focusing on how missions are structured and what operational complexities they entail, and not on how AI systems reach decisions, our analysis offers conceptual lenses for policy development that acknowledge the reality of governing black-box systems. These qualitative and heuristic frameworks are designed to provide policymakers with a common vocabulary for analysis rather than offer prescriptive solutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38105/spr.3v9f8hi6zq
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the black box: Operational lenses for AI-enabled drone governance

Demetrius Hernandez, T. Placeres Hernández, Kaitlin Harris, R. Morales
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Navigating the black box: Operational lenses for AI-enabled drone governance

Demetrius Hernandez, T. Placeres Hernández, Kaitlin Harris, R. Morales
article en

Abstract

Drones equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) now deliver medical supplies in remote regions, monitor environmental changes, and conduct military operations. Worldwide, regulators are racing to layer broad AI rules with drone-specific safety standards; however, the resulting patchwork is still fragmented and unevenly enforced. As AI decision-making processes are often opaque, governance approaches that rely on understanding internal system mechanics face significant challenges. In this review, we examine the existing governance landscape on AI-enabled drones and demonstrate why drones that share identical hardware and AI architecture raise different ethical and legal questions depending on their deployment context. By focusing on how missions are structured and what operational complexities they entail, and not on how AI systems reach decisions, our analysis offers conceptual lenses for policy development that acknowledge the reality of governing black-box systems. These qualitative and heuristic frameworks are designed to provide policymakers with a common vocabulary for analysis rather than offer prescriptive solutions.

Vol. 6
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.