Government and Opposition on the Road to EU Accession: Responsibility, Responsiveness and the Salience of Gender Equality

Abstract We theorize party attention to gender issues within the responsibility-versus-responsiveness framework, deriving and testing novel hypotheses in six Western Balkan countries (2012–2021) that aspire to European Union (EU) membership. We analyse gender-related responsibility in European Commission (EC) recommendations and examine party discourse to assess whether, how and to what extent parties and the EC align under conditions of supportive/opposing public opinion (responsiveness). Generally, attention to gender issues is low, especially on controversial topics like LGBTIQ+ rights (‘thick’ gender equality), compared to broadly accepted women’s rights (‘thin’ gender equality). Governing status influences attention to ‘thin’ gender issues, while ‘thick’ issues are highlighted mainly by green/alternative/libertarian (GAL) opposition parties. Our study advances knowledge of how public opinion, governing/opposition status and party ideology shape party attention to gender issues in aspiring EU members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Government and Opposition
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2025.12
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government and Opposition on the Road to EU Accession: Responsibility, Responsiveness and the Salience of Gender Equality

Zoe Lefkofridi, Nadine Zwiener‐Collins, Klaudia Koxha
2 links
Government and Opposition
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Government and Opposition on the Road to EU Accession: Responsibility, Responsiveness and the Salience of Gender Equality

Zoe Lefkofridi, Nadine Zwiener‐Collins, Klaudia Koxha
article en

Abstract

Abstract We theorize party attention to gender issues within the responsibility-versus-responsiveness framework, deriving and testing novel hypotheses in six Western Balkan countries (2012–2021) that aspire to European Union (EU) membership. We analyse gender-related responsibility in European Commission (EC) recommendations and examine party discourse to assess whether, how and to what extent parties and the EC align under conditions of supportive/opposing public opinion (responsiveness). Generally, attention to gender issues is low, especially on controversial topics like LGBTIQ+ rights (‘thick’ gender equality), compared to broadly accepted women’s rights (‘thin’ gender equality). Governing status influences attention to ‘thin’ gender issues, while ‘thick’ issues are highlighted mainly by green/alternative/libertarian (GAL) opposition parties. Our study advances knowledge of how public opinion, governing/opposition status and party ideology shape party attention to gender issues in aspiring EU members.

Government and OppositionVol. 60(4)
University of Salzburg (AT), Institute of Political Studies (PL), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Government and Opposition on the Road to EU Accession: Responsibility, Responsiveness and the Salience of Gender Equality — Zoe Lefkofridi, Nadine Zwiener‐Collins, et al. · Government and Opposition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS