Scientific legacy: The bibliometric mapping. (Part 2: International level)

In the second part of the study, the authors analyze the publication activity related to the use of the term “scientific legacy” in international academic literature indexed in the OpenAlex database. The comparative analysis revealed the key differences in approaches, semantic interpretations, and thematic emphases between the international and Russian scholarly practices. Particular attention was given to identifying the features of the conceptualization and interpretation of scientific legacy in the international context which enables to assess theoretical and methodological framework of this phenomenon on a global scale.The study methodology includes bibliometric methods and statistical processing of publication metadata. The findings demonstrate that while the interest in scientific legacy study in the Russian Federation is growing, the international scholarly practice exhibits the broader range of contexts for using the term. Notably, Russian academic literature has significant gaps, particularly regarding the sociocultural interpretations of scientific legacy. At the same time, the national trends in publication activity corresponds with international patterns, and Russia’s position in this domain can be characterized as stable and promising.The authors emphasize the need for strategic collaboration of Russian researchers and global scholarly community to study and promote national scientific legacy globally. This approach will not only enhance awareness of Russian scientific achievements but also strengthen their contribution to shaping the global scientific discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific and Technical Libraries
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2025-7-29-47
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific legacy: The bibliometric mapping. (Part 2: International level)

Виктор Благинин, Elizaveta Vitalievna Sokolova, M. N. Goncharova
1 citations
Scientific and Technical Libraries
Educational Innovations and Challenges
3.25
article

Scientific legacy: The bibliometric mapping. (Part 2: International level)

Виктор Благинин, Elizaveta Vitalievna Sokolova, M. N. Goncharova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the second part of the study, the authors analyze the publication activity related to the use of the term “scientific legacy” in international academic literature indexed in the OpenAlex database. The comparative analysis revealed the key differences in approaches, semantic interpretations, and thematic emphases between the international and Russian scholarly practices. Particular attention was given to identifying the features of the conceptualization and interpretation of scientific legacy in the international context which enables to assess theoretical and methodological framework of this phenomenon on a global scale.The study methodology includes bibliometric methods and statistical processing of publication metadata. The findings demonstrate that while the interest in scientific legacy study in the Russian Federation is growing, the international scholarly practice exhibits the broader range of contexts for using the term. Notably, Russian academic literature has significant gaps, particularly regarding the sociocultural interpretations of scientific legacy. At the same time, the national trends in publication activity corresponds with international patterns, and Russia’s position in this domain can be characterized as stable and promising.The authors emphasize the need for strategic collaboration of Russian researchers and global scholarly community to study and promote national scientific legacy globally. This approach will not only enhance awareness of Russian scientific achievements but also strengthen their contribution to shaping the global scientific discourse.

Scientific and Technical Libraries(7)
Ural State University of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.