Subsurface Lithology Analysis Using HVSR Method in Jorong Ranah, X Koto Singkarak District

Jorong Ranah bordered Sumani segment and the Sianok segment. Both of these segments had experienced demaging earthquakes that affected Jorong Ranah. The damage caused could be determined by analyzing the subsurface lithology. This study aimed to determine the value of dominant frequency (f0) and amplification factor (A0) as well as the shear wave velocity (Vs) and subsurface lithology. Microtremor research was conducted at 8 measurement points. Microtremor signals were analyzed using the HVSR method to obtain data in the form of f0 and A0 presented in the form of H/V curves. The values were analyzed using Easy HVSR software to obtain a curve of shear wave velocity values against depth. 2D modeling of subsurface lithology was conducted using Rockworks software. The results showed that the f0 value in Jorong Ranah ranged from 1.25 - 14.75 Hz and the A0 value ranged from 3.26 - 6.92. The shear wave velocity (Vs) values ranged from 100 m/s - 1,604 m/s at depths ranging from 0 - 116.67 meters. In the first layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were silt, hard sandy loam, breccia tuff, red soil, and gracefully sandstone. In the second layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were silt, hard sandy loam, tuff, and volcanic breccia. In the third layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were red soil, volcanic breccia, tuff, and tuff breccia. And in the fourth layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were red soil and tuff breccia. Subsurface lithology affected potential damage, with high shear wave velocity (Vs) indicating stable, dense rocks and lower damage potential, while low Vs values suggested soft rocks that were more prone to deformation and higher damage risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Geologi dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal)
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v6i2.818
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subsurface Lithology Analysis Using HVSR Method in Jorong Ranah, X Koto Singkarak District

Muhammad Mahdy Althaf, Syafriani Syafriani, Harman Amir Zulhendra
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Geologi dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal)
Geological Modeling and Analysis
article

Subsurface Lithology Analysis Using HVSR Method in Jorong Ranah, X Koto Singkarak District

Muhammad Mahdy Althaf, Syafriani Syafriani, Harman Amir Zulhendra
article en

Abstract

Jorong Ranah bordered Sumani segment and the Sianok segment. Both of these segments had experienced demaging earthquakes that affected Jorong Ranah. The damage caused could be determined by analyzing the subsurface lithology. This study aimed to determine the value of dominant frequency (f0) and amplification factor (A0) as well as the shear wave velocity (Vs) and subsurface lithology. Microtremor research was conducted at 8 measurement points. Microtremor signals were analyzed using the HVSR method to obtain data in the form of f0 and A0 presented in the form of H/V curves. The values were analyzed using Easy HVSR software to obtain a curve of shear wave velocity values against depth. 2D modeling of subsurface lithology was conducted using Rockworks software. The results showed that the f0 value in Jorong Ranah ranged from 1.25 - 14.75 Hz and the A0 value ranged from 3.26 - 6.92. The shear wave velocity (Vs) values ranged from 100 m/s - 1,604 m/s at depths ranging from 0 - 116.67 meters. In the first layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were silt, hard sandy loam, breccia tuff, red soil, and gracefully sandstone. In the second layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were silt, hard sandy loam, tuff, and volcanic breccia. In the third layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were red soil, volcanic breccia, tuff, and tuff breccia. And in the fourth layer, the dominating subsurface lithologies were red soil and tuff breccia. Subsurface lithology affected potential damage, with high shear wave velocity (Vs) indicating stable, dense rocks and lower damage potential, while low Vs values suggested soft rocks that were more prone to deformation and higher damage risk.

Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Geologi dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal)Vol. 6(2)
State University of Padang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.